نوع مقاله : مقاله علمی پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 استادیار آموزش زبان انگلیسی دانشگاه علامه طباطبائی

2 دانشجوی دکتری آموزش زبان انگلیسی دانشگاه شهید بهشتی

چکیده

با در نظر گرفتن نقش انکارناپذیر شبکه های اجتماعی در مراودات زبانی-اجتماعی و با توجه به ضرورت شناخت علمی این پدیده ها و به دلیل نبود پژوهش های کافی زبانشناختی در این حوزه، پژوهش حاضر با هدف بررسی راهبرد های دو کنش گفتاری موافقت و مخالفت کردن در فیس بوک در بین انگلیسی زبان و فارسی زبان انجام شد. بدین منظور پیکره ای متشکل از 1196 کامنت (596 کامنت در هر زبان) انتخاب و بر طبق مدل های موجود تحلیل شد. پیکره جمع آوری شده از بعد راهبردهای ابراز احساسات در هنگام موافقت و مخالفت نیز تحلیل شد. یافته ها نشان داد که بین فارسی زبانان و انگلیسی زبانان تفاوت معنی داری از لحاظ استفاده از راهبرد های موافقت و مخالفت و نیز راهبردهای ابراز احساسات در هنگام موافقت و مخالفت وجود دارد. همچنین، مشخص شد که زنان و مردان هر کدام از راهبردهای متفاوتی برای ابراز احساساتشان در حین موافقت یا مخالفت بهره می برند. به علاوه، نتایج این پژوهش اثبات کرد که به طور کلی زنان نسبت به مردان از راهبردهای بیشتری برای اشاره به دو کنش گفتاری مذکور استفاده می کنند. این یافته ها می تواند در شناخت زبانشناختی شبکه های اجتماعی، به خصوص فیس بوک، و زبان مورد استفاده در آن مورد استفاده پژوهشگران حوزه های علوم ارتباطات و منظورشناسی قرار گیرد.

کلیدواژه‌ها

عنوان مقاله [English]

A Contrastive Study of Agreement and Disagreement Strategies In Facebook: Persian vs. English

نویسندگان [English]

  • Amir Zandmoghadam 1
  • Roya Vafaeimehr 2

2 Shahid Beheshti University

چکیده [English]

Given the inevitable role of social networks in our social-linguistic interactions and because of the fact that social networks need to be analyzed and understood scientifically and that few studies have investigated social networks from a linguistic perspective, the aim of the present study was to investigate and describe agreement and disagreement strategies used by Persian and English native speakers in their comment tags in Facebook. To this end, a corpus of 1196 comments was collected and analyzed based on the existing models of speech act strategies. Also, their use of strategies to express their feelings while agreeing and disagreeing in their comments was analyzed. The findings revealed that there is a significant difference between English and Persian native speakers in terms of the strategies they use for agreement and disagreement speech acts and the expression of their feelings while agreeing and disagreeing. It was also found that there is a difference between males and females in terms of using agreeing and disagreeing strategies and the accompanying strategies for the expression of their feelings; females were observed to use more strategies on the whole. The results of this study can have a contribution to the researchers in the fields of communication sciences and pragmatics.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Pragmatics
  • Speech act
  • Strategy
  • Facebook
-  Afghari, A. (2007). A sociopragmatic study of apology speech act realization patterns in Persian. Speech Communication, 49, 177-185.
-  Austin, J. L. (1962). How to do things with words. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
-  Baym, N. K. (1996). Agreements and disagreements in a computer-mediated discussion. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 29(4), 315-345.
-  Blum-Kulka, S., & Olshtain, E. (1984). Request and apologies: A cross-cultural study of speech act realization patterns (CCSARP). Applied Linguistics, 5(3), 196-213.
-  Bolander, B. (2012). Disagreements and agreements in personal/diary blogs: A closer look at responsiveness. Journal of Pragmatics, 44(12), 1607-1622.
-  Bousmails, K., Mehu, M., & Pantic, M. (2013). Towards the automatic detection of spontaneous agreement and disagreement based on nonverbal behavior: A survey of related cues, data bases and tools. Image and Vision Computing, 31, 203-221.
-  Brown, P., & Levinson, S. C. (1987). Politeness: Some universals in language usage (Vol. 4). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
-  Crystal, D. (1985). A dictionary of linguistics and phonetics (2nd ed.): Oxford: Blackwell.
-  Dresner, E., & Herring, S. C. (2010). Functions of the nonverbal in CMC: Emoticons and illocutionary force. Communication Theory, 20(3), 249-268.
-  Guiller, J., & Durndell, A. (2006). I totally agree with you: Gender interactions in educational online discussion groups. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning22(5), 368-381.
-  Herring, S. (1994, June). Gender differences in computer-mediated communication: Bringing familiar baggage to the new frontier. Keynote Address at the American Library Association Annual Convention, Miami.
-  Herring, S. C. (Ed.) (1996). Computer-mediated communication: Linguistic, social and cross-cultural perspectives (pp. 81-106). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
-  Herring, S. C. (1998). Le style du courrier électronique: variabilité et changement. Terminogramme, 84-85, 9-16.
-  Herring, S. C. (2001). Computer-mediated discourse. In D. Tannen, D. Schiffrin, & H. Hamilton (Eds.), Handbook of discourse analysis (pp. 612-634). Oxford: Blackwell.
-  Holtgraves, T. M. (2001). Language as social action: Social psychology and language use. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
-  Kashkouli, Z., & Eslamirasekh, A. (2013). The effect of context-external factors on context-internal factors in apology perception: A case in Iranian context. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 70, 1590-1599.
-  Koczogh, H. V. (2012). The effects of gender and social distance on the expression of verbal disagreement employed by Hungarian undergraduate students. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation. University of Debercen.
-  Kushin, M. J., & Kitchener, K. (2009). Getting political on social network sites: Exploring online political discourse on Facebook. First Monday, 14, 2-11.
-  Lakoff, R. T. (1975). Language and woman's place (Vol. 56). New York, NY: Harper & Row.
-  Langlotz, A., & Locher, M. A. (2012). Ways of communicating emotional stance in online disagreements. Journal of Pragmatics, 44(12), 1591-1606.
-  Leech, G. N. (1983). Principles of pragmatics. London: Longman.
-  Locher, M. A. (2004). Power and politeness in action: Disagreements in oral communication (Vol. 12). Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.
-  López, S. R., & Guarnaccia, P. J. (2000). Cultural psychopathology: Uncovering the social world of mental illness. Annual Review of Psychology, 51(1), 571-598.
-  Mey, J. L. (2001). Pragmatics: An introduction. Oxford: Blackwell publishers.
-  Nazir, B. (2012). Gender patterns on Facebook: A sociolinguistic perspective. International Journal of Linguistics, 4(3), 252-265.
-  Nureddeen, F. A. (2008). Cross-cultural pragmatics: Apology strategies in Sudanese Arabic. Journal of Pragmatics, 40, 279-306.
-  Pishghadam, R. (2011). Delving into speech act of suggestion: A case of Iranian EFL learners. International Journal of Business and Social Science, 2 (16), 152-160.
-  Pomerantz, A. M. (1984). Giving a source or basis: The practice in conversation of telling how I know. Journal of pragmatics, 8(5), 607-625.
-  Rambe, P. (2012). Critical discourse analysis of collaborative engagement in Facebook postings. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 28(2), 295-314.
-  Rees-Miller, J. (2000). Power, severity, and context in disagreement. Journal of Pragmatics, 32(8), 1087-1111.
-  Schauer, G. (2009). Interlanguage pragmatic development: The study abroad context. London: Continuum International Publishing Group.
-  Searle, J. R. (1969). Speech acts: An essay in the philosophy of language (Vol. 626). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
-  Shum, W., & Lee, C. (2013). (Im)politeness and disagreement in two Hong Kong Internet discussion forums. Journal of Pragmatics, 50(1), 52-83.
-  Sifianou, M. (2012). Disagreements, face and politeness. Journal of Pragmatics, 44(12), 1554-1564.
-  Takahashi, S. (1996). Pragmatic transferability. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 18, 189-224.
-  Yin, J., Thomas, P., Narang, N., & Paris, C. (2012, July). Unifying local and global agreement and disagreement classification in online debates. Proceedings of the 3rd Workshop in Computational Approaches to Subjectivity and Sentiment Analysis (pp. 61-69).
-  Walther, J. B., Loh, T., & Granka, L. (2005). Let me count the ways the interchange of verbal and nonverbal cues in computer-mediated and face-to-face affinity. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 24(1), 36-65.
-  Zuckerberg, M. (2009). An open letter from Facebook founder Mark Zuckerberg. Retrieved from
       http://blog.facebook.com/blog.php?post=190423927130 on January
       18th, 2010.