Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

1 Associate Professor at National Research Institute for Science Policy.

2 Ph.D. in Sociology of Development University of Tehran. (Corresponding Author)

Abstract

The development of the Internet as a modern communication technology has raised new, important and different issues regarding the relation between this technology and the public sphere. In this paper, based on Habermaus’s theory, we have proposed four fundamental questions about the possibility and impossibility of development of the public sphere in the cyberspace in order to prepare a systematic review of the proposed theories. Based on the results of the study, it is possible to distinguish three different views toward the development of virtual public sphere: possibility, impossibility, and conditional nature of the formation of the virtual public sphere. The resultant of these three views is that despite the capacity of the cyberspace for the development of virtual public sphere, there are still important challenges such as the digital divide, polarization, cyberspace fragmentation, anonymity, and loosening of the real social ties. In addition, closer study of the relation between cyberspace and public sphere requires us to avoid technological determinism, and consider the institutional and social contexts and perform comparative studies on different social and institutional contexts 

Keywords

منابع
- خانیکی،‌هادی (1393). ضعف جامعه مدنی و آسیب­های ارتباطی در ایران، مجموعه مقالات دومین همایش ملی آسیب­های اجتماعی در ایران، خرداد 1391، جلد نهم، تهران: آگاه.
- دهقان، علیرضا (1385). روزنامه‌نگاری الکترونیک: فرصت‌ها و محدودیت‌ها، مجله جهانی رسانه، شماره 2، قابل دسترس در
http://gmj.ut.ac.ir/maghale.aspx?id=31
- سالتر، لی (1383). دموکراسی، جنبش­های نوین اجتماعی و اینترنت، ترجمه پیروز ایزدی، فصلنامه رسانه، 59، 162-133.
- شاقاسمی، احسان (1385)، مروری بر زمینه‌های تاثیر فضای مجازی بر نظریه‌‏های ارتباطات، مجله جهانی رسانه، شماره 2، قابل دسترس در
http://gmj.ut.ac.ir/maghale.aspx?id=36
- ظهوری، علیرضا (1386). دنیای مجازی: بازار اطلاعاتی دموکراتیک تواناساز یا سراب محدود کننده؟، مجله جهانی رسانه، شماره3، قابل دسترس در
http://gmj.ut.ac.ir/maghale.aspx?id=40
- فیدر، جان (1380). جامعهاطلاعاتی، ترجمه علی رادباوه و عباس گیلوردی، چاپ اول، نشر کتابدار
- کوثری، مسعود (1387)، آنومی اجتماعی در اجتماعات مجازی، مسعود کوثری و دیگران، اینترنت و آسیب‌های اجتماعی، تهران: سلمان.
- مهدی­زاده، محمد (1383). اینترنت و حوزه عمومی، فصلنامه رسانه، 59، 132-111.
- وبستر، فرانک (1382). نظریه‌های جامعه اطلاعاتی، ترجمه مهدی داودی، تهران: وزارت امور خارجه.
-Barlow, J.P. (1996) A Declaration of the Independence of Cyberspace. http://www.eff.org/~barlow/Declaration-Final.html.
-Bauman, Z. (1999). In search of politics. Stanford University Press.
-Beers, D. (2006). The public sphere and online, independent journalism. Canadian Journal of Education/Revue canadienne de l'éducation, 109-130.
-Blumler, J. G., & Coleman, S. (2001) Realizing Democracy Online: A Civic Commons in Cyberspace. IPPR/Citizens Online Research Publication No. 2
-Brandenburg, H. (2003) ‘Pathologies of the Virtual Public Sphere’, The European Consortium for Political Research (ECPR) Edinburg.
-Carey, J. (1995). The press, public opinion, and public discourse. Public opinion and the communication of consent, 373-402.
-Castells, M. (2003). The Internet galaxy: Reflections on the Internet, business, and society. New York: Oxford University Press.
-Cooper, M. N. (2003). Media ownership and democracy in the digital information age: Promoting diversity with first amendment principles and market structure analysis. Stanford Law School, Center for Internet & Society.
-Dahlberg, L. (2001). Extending the public sphere through cyberspace: The case of Minnesota E-Democracy. First Monday, 6 (3).
-DiMaggio, P., Hargittai, E., Neuman, W. R., & Robinson, J. P. (2001). Social implications of the Internet. Annual review of sociology, 307-336.
-Douglas, S. J. (1989). Inventing American Broadcasting, 1899-1922 (p. xxv). Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
-Gerhards, J., & Schäfer, M. S. (2010). Is the internet a better public sphere? Comparing old and new media in the USA and Germany. New Media & Society, 12 (1), 143-160.
-Habermas, J. (1989). The Structural Transformation of the public Sphere. London: Polity press.
-Habermas, J. (1996). Between Facts and Norms. London: Polity press
-Hauben, R. (1999)'The Internet: A New Communication Paradigm', in Representationin Cyberspace Study, Berkman Center for Internet and Society at Harvard Law School. Online. Available http://cyber. harvard. edu/rcs/hauben. html
-Jensen, J. L. (2002). The Public Sphere, Deliberation and the Internet. in Niels Brügger, N. & Bødker, H. (eds) “The Internet and Society?”, The Center for Internet Research, Aarhus, Denmark.
-Licklider, J. C., & Taylor, R. W. (1968). The computer as a communication device. Science and technology, 76 (2), 1-3.
-McChesney, R. W. (1996). The Internet and US communication policy making in historical and critical perspective. Journal of Communication, 46 (1), 98-124.
-O’Brien, R. (1999). Civil Society, the Public Sphere and the Internet. Retrieved on February, 1, 2012.
-Petticrew, M., & Roberts, H. (2008). Systematic reviews in the social sciences: A practical guide. Wiley. com.
-Slevin, J. (2002). The Internet and Society: central themes and issues. N. Brügger and H. Bødker (eds.), 7-12.
-Slevin, J. (2000). The Internet and Society, Cambridge: Polity Press.
-Sorj, B. (2006). Internet, Public Sphere and Political Marketing: Between the Promotion of Communication and Moralist Solipsism. Rio de Janeiro: The Edelstein Center for Social Research, Working Paper, 2.
-Sunstein, C. (2001) Republic.com. Princeton: Princeton University Press
-Thompson, G. (2003). Weblogs, warblogs, the public sphere, and bubbles. Transformations, 7, 1-12.
-Ubayasiri, K. (2006). Internet and the Public Sphere: A glimpse of YouTube, Central Queensland University.
-Wilhelm, A.G. (2000) Democracy in the Digital Age. Challenges to Political Life in Cyberspace. New York and London: Routledge