Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

1 Social science faculty,Allameh Tabataba'i University,Tehran,Iran

2 Department of Social Science, Shahid Beheshti University

Abstract

The increasing in the use of new media has attracted scholars’ attention to the relationship between those technologies and variant aspects of everyday life and a great number of contradictory perspectives have been postulated regarding implications of new media technologies in relation to families. In our society, the growing use of modern media has also led to significant studies of the impact of these media on families. In this study, we formulate diverse views on the effects of new media on families grounded in three approaches, namely pathological, positive effects and the complexity of effects approach, and consequently, published articles during last decade (2006-2016) were investigated. By utilizing meta-analysis as research method, the articles were scrutinized from various aspects such as theoretical approaches, methodology, research variables and findings. The findings indicated that those articles were mostly focused on pathological approach, and new media was represented as a harmful media. What is more, the complexity of new media effects, the role of variables and mediator factors as well as the role of families in acceptance or rejection of media, and controlling their effects have been overlooked. In this way, a passive image of family’s exposure to such media has been revealed. Ultimately, some suggestions on how to apply substantive theories, specifically in the field of family, mixed methods and longitudinal studies were offered. Moreover, paying serious attention to the influence mechanisms and mediator variables was accentuated in order to grasp the mutual relationship between new media and divergent facets of family.

Keywords

-       Amichai-Hamburger, Y., & Ben-Artzi, E. (2003). Loneliness and Internet use. Computers in human behavior, 19(1), 71-80.
-       Atewell, P.,& Battle, P. A. J. (1999). Home computers and school performance. The information society, 15(1), 1-10.
-       Barrera, M., Chassin, L., & Rogosch, F. (1993). Effects of social support and conflict on adolescent children of alcoholic and nonalcoholic fathers. Journal of personality and social psychology, 64(4), 602.
-       Berardo, F. (1998). Family privacy: Issues and concepts. Journal of Family Issues, 118, 4–19.
-       Bovill, Moria and Sonia M. Livingstone. 2001. “Bedroom Culture and the Privatisation of Media Use” [online]. London: LSE Research Online.
-       Bronfenbrenner, U. (1986). Ecology of the family as a context for human development: Research perspectives. Developmental psychology, 22(6), 723.
-       Bubolz, M. M., & Sontag, M. S. (2009). Human ecology theory. In Sourcebook of family theories and methods (pp. 419-450). Springer, Boston, MA.
-       Buckingham, D. (2013). After the death of childhood. John Wiley & Sons.
-       Carvalho, J., Francisco, R., & Relvas, A. P. (2015). Family functioning and information and communication technologies: How do they relate? A literature review. Computers in Human Behavior, 45, 99-108.
-       Collier, K. M., Coyne, S. M., Rasmussen, E. E., Hawkins, A. J., Padilla-Walker, L. M., Erickson, S. E., & Memmott-Elison, M. K. (2016). Does parental mediation of media influence child outcomes? A meta-analysis on media time, aggression, substance use, and sexual behavior. Developmental psychology, 52(5), 798.
-       Daly, K. J. (1996). Families and time: Keeping pace in a hurried culture. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
-       DiMaggio, P., Hargittai, E., Neuman, W. R., & Robinson, J. P. (2001). Social implications of the Internet. Annual review of sociology, 27(1), 307-336.
-       Fikkers, K. M., Piotrowski, J. T., & Valkenburg, P. M. (2017). A matter of style? Exploring the effects of parental mediation styles on early adolescents’ media violence exposure and aggression. Computers in Human Behavior, 70, 407-415.
-       Fischer, C. S. (1992). America calling: A social history of the telephone to 1940. Univ of California Press.
-       Haddon, L. (2006). The contribution of domestication research to in-home computing and media consumption. The information society, 22(4), 195-203.
-       Haddon, L., & Mante-Meijer, E. (2016). Parental mediation of internet use: Evaluating family relationships. In Generational use of new media (pp. 31-48). Routledge.
-       Hampton, K. N., & Wellman, B. (1999). Examining community in the digital neighborhood: early results from Canada’s wired suburb. In Digital cities (pp. 194-208). Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg.
-       Hertlein, K. M. (2012). Digital dwelling: Technology in couple and family relationships. Family Relations, 61(3), 374-387.
-       Howard, P. E., Rainie, L., & Jones, S. (2001). Days and nights on the Internet: The impact of a diffusing technology. American Behavioral Scientist, 45(3), 383-404.
-       Hughes, Jr., R. & Hans, J. D. (2004). Understanding the effects of the Internet on family life. In Handbook of contemporary families (pp. 506-520). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
-       Katz, J. E., & Aspden, P. (1997). A nation of strangers. Communications of the ACM, 40(12), 81–86.
-       Katz, J.E. and Rice, R. (2002) Social Consequences of Internet Use, Boston: MIT press.
-       Kiesler, S., Zdaniuk, B., Lundmark, V., & Kraut, R. (2000). Troubles with the Internet: The dynamics of help at home. Human-computer interaction, 15(4), 323-351.
-       Kildare, C. A., & Middlemiss, W. (2017). Impact of parents mobile device use on parent-child interaction: A literature review. Computers in Human Behavior, 75, 579-593.
-       Kraut, R., Kiesler, S., Boneva, B., Cummings, J., Helgeson, V., & Crawford, A. (2002). Internet paradox revisited. Journal of social issues, 58(1), 49-74.
-       Kraut, R., Mukhopadhyay, T., Szczypula, J., Kiesler, S., & Scherlis, B. (1999). Information and communication: Alternative uses of the Internet in households. Information Systems Research, 10(4), 287-303.
-       Kraut, R., Patterson, M., Lundmark, V., Kiesler, S., Mukiphadhyay, T., & Scherlis, W. (1998) ‘Internet Paradox: A Social Technology that Reduces Social Involvement and Psychological Well Being?’, American Psychologist 53: 1011-1031.
-       Lenhart, A., Madden, M., & Hitlin, P. (2005). Teens and technology.Washington, DC: Pew and American Life Project.
-       Lenhart, A., Rainie, L., & Lewis, O. (2001). Teenage life online: The rise of the instant-message generation and the Internet's impact on friendships and family relationships.
-       Livingstone, S., & Bober, M. (2004). UK children go online. London: London School of Economics.
-       Lynd, R. S., & Lynd, H. M. (1929). Middletown. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
-       McGrath, S. (2012). The impact of new media technologies on social interaction in the household. Electronic Culture and Social Change.
-       Mesch, G. S. (2003). The family and the Internet: The Israeli case. Social Science Quarterly, 84(4), 1038-1050.
-       Mesch, G. S. (2006). Family characteristics and intergenerational conflicts over the Internet. Information, Communication & Society, 9(4), 473-495.
-       Mesch, G. S. (2006). Family relations and the Internet: Exploring a family boundaries approach. The Journal of Family Communication, 6(2), 119-138.
-       Morrison, M., & Krugman, D. M. (2001). A look at mass and computer mediated technologies: Understanding the roles of television and computers in the home. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 45(1), 135-161.
-       Newzoo. (2018). Top 50 Countries/Markets by Smartphone Users and Penetration, Retrieved 2018-12-05 at https://newzoo.com/insights/rankings/top-50-countries-by-smartphone-penetration-and-users/
-       Ogburn, W. F., & Nimkoff, M. F. (1955). Technology and the changing family. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
-       Orlean s, M., & Laney, M. C., (2000). Early adolescent social networks and computer use. Social Science Computer Review, 18, 56-72.
-       Padilla‐Walker, L. M., Coyne, S. M., & Fraser, A. M. (2012). Getting a high‐speed family connection: associations between family media use and family connection. Family Relations, 61(3), 426-440.
-       Pasquier, D., Buzzi, C., d'Haenens, L., & Sjöberg, U. (1998). Family lifestyles and media use patterns: An analysis of domestic media among Flemish, French, Italian and Swedish children and teenagers. European Journal of Communication, 13(4), 503-519.
-       Plowman, L., McPake, J., & Stephen, C. (2008). Just picking it up? Young children learning with technology at home. Cambridge Journal of Education, 38(3), 303-319.
-       Rheingold, H. (1993). The virtual community: Homesteading on the electronic frontier. Reading, MA: Addison Wesley.
-       Salaff, J. W. (2002). Where home is the office: The new form of flexible work. In The Internet in everyday life (pp. 464–495). Oxford, England: Blackwell.
-       Silverstone, R., & Haddon, L. (1996). Design and Domestication of Information and Communication Technologies: Technical change and everyday life. In Communication by Design: The Politics of Information and Communication Technologie(pp.44-74). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
-       Smetana, J. G. (1988). Adolescents' and parents' conceptions of parental authority. Child development, 321-335.
-       Stoll, C. (1995). Silicon snake oil. New York: Doubleday.
-       Subrahmanyam, K., Greenfield, P., Kraut, R. and Gross, E. (2001) ‘The Impact of Computer Use on Children’s and Adolescents’ Development’, Applied Developmental Psychology. 22: 7-30.
-       Venkatesh, A. & Vitalari, N. (1985). “Households and technology: The Case of Home Computers-Some Conceptual and Theoretical Issues.” in Marketing to the Changing Household (pp. 187-203). Ballinger Publishing.
-       Villegas, A. (2013). The influence of technology on family dynamics. Proceedings of the New York State Communication Association, 2012(1), 10.
-       Wellman, B., Haase, A. Q., Witte, J., & Hampton, K. (2001). Does the Internet increase, decrease, or supplement social capital? Social networks, participation, and community commitment. American behavioral scientist, 45(3), 436-455.
-       Yoon, K. (2006). Local sociality in young people’s mobile communications: A Korean case study. Childhood, 13(2), 155-174.