Twitter users Activism in Commemoration of Halabja Tragedy Victims

Mohammadi Nousoudi, Sondos; Bicharanlou, Abdollah

doi:10.22054/nms.2022.62467.1255

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

¹ Ph. D Student of Communication, University of Tehran,Tehran, Iran.

² Assistant Professor of ommunication, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran.

https://doi.org/10.22054/nms.2022.62467.1255

Abstract

on March 16, 1988 chemical attack on the Kurdish town of Halabja by Iraqi forces under Saddam Hussein, the largest ever chemical weapons attack,killed between 3000 to 5000 civilians, and injured 7000 to 10000 ones.Despite the depth and severity of this tragedy, due to the victims' lack of
access to the media, it did not make a clear image in the world public opinion and even among the Kurds themselves; but the proliferation of social media allowed victims to draw global public attention to the crime. This paper is to study the Kurdish activism in cyberspace by a focus on the 33rd chemical anniversary of Halabja through analyzing their hashtag activism on the social network Twitter. Research results show that 8 main axes in Kurdish hashtag activism are highlighted on Twitter, which include:
Narration of the Halabja tragedy on Twitter, a manifestation of symbolism in virtual activism by republishing photos of Omar Khavar and his child, pursuing the suffering of this pain in the faces of the survivors, the media coverage of the Halabja tragedy worldwide, Halabja as a common pain, not
forgetting the Halabja tragedy, the founders of the Halabja genocide, and switching between online and offline activism boundaries. Based on the research results, Twitter acts as an online public sphere for Kurds, enabling them to develop an alternative discourse on the Halabja tragedy by creating a media stream.

Keywords

20.1001.1.25382209.1401.8.29.1.5

References

Ahmed, S., Jaidka, K., & Cho, J. (2016) “Tweeting India’s Nirbhaya protest: a study of emotional dynamics in an online social movement”. Social Movement Studies: 1-19. 2.

Bennett, W. L., & Segerberg, A. (2012). “The Logic of Connective Action”. Information, Communication & Society, 15(5), 739–768.

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). “Using thematic analysis in psychology”. Qualitative research in psychology, 3(2), 77-101.

Caleffi, P. M. (2015). “The 'hashtag': A new word or a new rule?” SKASE Journal of Theoretical Linguistics, 12(2).

Cammaerts, B. (2007). “Activism and media”. In B, Cammaerts., & N, Carpentier (eds). Reclaiming the media: communication rights and democratic media roles (217-224). Bristol, UK: Intellect Books.

Cammaerts, B. (2015). “Social media and activism”. In R, Mansell., & P, Hwa (Eds.). The International Encyclopedia of Digital Communication and Society (1027-1034). Oxford, UK: Wiley-Blackwell.

Dadas, C. (2017). “Hashtag Activism: The Promise and Risk of ‘Attention”. Social Writing/ Social Media: Publics, Presentations, Pedagogies, 17-36.

Dahlberg, L. (2001). “Computer‐mediated communication and the public sphere: A critical analysis”. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 7 (1).

Dahlgren, P. (2013). “The political web: Media, participation and alternative democracy”. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

de-Andrés-del-Campo, S., Nos-Aldas, E., & García-Matilla, A. (2016). “The transformative image. The power of a photograph for social change: The death of Aylan”. Comunicar. Media Education Research Journal, 24(1).

Oloyede, F., & Elega, A. A. (2019). “Exploring Hashtag Activism in Nigeria: A case of# EndSars Campaign”. In Conference Proceeding: 5th In Communication and Media Studies (CRPC 2018), Famagusta, Turkish Republic of Northern Cyprus.

Ferrer, A. F., & Retis, J. (2019). “Ethnic minority media: Between hegemony and resistance”. Journal of Alternative & Community Media, 4(3), 1-13.

Gunter, M. M. (2009).” The A to Z of the Kurds”. Lanham, MD; Toronto; Plymouth, UK

Habermas, J. (1989). “The Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere: An Inquiry into a Category of Bourgeois Society”. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Hama, S. A., Al-Jaff, B. M., & Mahmud, B. M. (2008). “The effect of chemical warfare agents on the immune system of survivors in Halabja”. In International conference on Genocide against the Kurdish people (pp. 179-183).

Harlow, S. (2012). “Social Change and Social Media: Latin American Activists’ Use of Digital Tools in the Face of the Digital Divide”. Presented at the the 2012 Congress of the Latin American Studies Association, San Francisco, California.

Jackson, E. (2015). “Fan Activism: Exploring Fan Activism as the Convergence of Social Activism and Fandom Communities in Online Spaces”, M.A Thesis. The University of Edinburgh.

Jordan, T. (2002). “Activism: direct action, hacktivism and the future of society”. London: Reaktion Books Ltd.

Joyce, M. (2010). “Digital Activism Decoded: The New Mechanics of Change”. New York: international debate education association.

Lowrey, W., & Anderson, W. (2005). “The journalist behind the curtain: Participatory functions on the Internet and their impact on perceptions of the work of journalism.” Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 10(3), article 13.

McCaughey, M. & Ayers, M. D. (2003). Introduction. In McCaughey, M & Ayers M. D. (eds.) Cyberactivism: online activism in theory and practice. New York: Routledge, pp. 1-24.

Meikle, G. (2010). “Intercreativity: Mapping Online Activism”. In Hunsinger, J., Klastrup, L. & Allen, M. (eds.) International Handbook of Internet Re-search. Dordrecht: Springer, pp. 363-377

Meikle, G. (2002). Future active: media activism and the Internet. London: Routledge.

Moscato, D. (2016). “Media portrayals of hashtag activism: A framing analysis of Canada’s# Idlenomore movement”. Media and Communication, 4(2), 3.

Ofori-Parku, S. S., & Moscato, D. (2018). “Hashtag Activism as a Form of Political Action: A Qualitative Analysis of the# BringBackOurGirls Campaign in Nigerian, UK, and US Press. International Journal of Communication, 12, 23.

Papacharissi, Z. (2004). Democracy online: Civility, politeness, and the democratic potential of online political discussion groups. New media & society, 6(2), 259-283.

Paulussen, S. (2004). “Online news production in Flanders: How Flemish online journalists perceive and explore the Internet’s potential”. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 9(4).

Poor, N. (2005). “Mechanisms of an online public sphere: The website Slashdot”. Journal of computer-mediated communication, 10(2), JCMC1028.

Ricketts, A. (2012). “The Activists’ Handbook: A step-by-step guide to participatory democracy was”. New York: Zed Books.

Schäfer, M. S. (2015). “Digital public sphere. The international encyclopedia of political communication, 1-7.

Sheyholislami, J. (2011). “Kurdish identity, discourse, and new media”. Springer.

Torelli, S. M. (2017). “Kurdisdtan. An Invisible Nation”. Edizioni Epoké.

Valle, J.M. (1978). Imágenes-tatuaje. Mensaje y Medios, 4, 47-50.

Van Laer, J., & Van Aelst, P. (2010). “Internet and social movement action repertoires. Information, Communication & Society, 13(8), 1146-1171.

Vegh, S. (2003). Classifying forms of online activism: The case of cyberprotests against the World Bank. In M. McCaughey., & M. Ayers (Eds). Cyberactivism: Online activism in theory and practice (pp. 71–95). New York: Routledge.

Watson, O. R. (2005). You decide: The dictator watch guide to social and environmental activism. Retrieved March 26,2021, from: http://www.activism101.org/dwguide/guidetofc.html

Yang, G. (2016). “Narrative agency in hashtag activism: The case of #BlackLivesMatter. Media and Communication, 4(4), 13–17.

Yildiz, K. (2007). “The Kurds in Iraq-: The Past, Present and Future”. Pluto Press.

New Media Studies

Twitter users Activism in Commemoration of Halabja Tragedy Victims

References

References

Volume 8, Issue 29
April 2022
Pages 40-1

Twitter users Activism in Commemoration of Halabja Tragedy Victims

References

References

Volume 8, Issue 29April 2022Pages 40-1

Volume 8, Issue 29
April 2022
Pages 40-1