Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

1 Professor, Head of the Department of Journalism, Faculty of Communication Sciences, Allameh Tabataba’i University, Tehran, Iran

2 Ph.D. in Communication Sciences, Allameh Tabataba’i University, Tehran, Iran

Abstract

This research explored the Iranian user's ways of behavior in Instagram as a social networking service from the viewpoint of users’ online interactions and their daily life online representation. According to this, trying to get two main answers: “Recognizing cultural model in user's behaviors” and “identifying reasons and motivations of user's behaviors as a subsidiary purpose”. This research is based on ethnographic methodology and because of having a wide range of perspectives as a characteristic of contemporary ethnography, I used Symbolic Interactionism as a theoretical framework and the research method which is used for this purpose named Netnography by Robert Kozinets (2010). Netnography is a specific approach to conducting ethnography on the Internet. It is a qualitative and interpretive research methodology that adapts traditional ethnographic techniques to understand social interaction in contemporary digital communication contexts. The Netnography process in this research is based on the spiraling shells which Kozinets introduced: Introspection, Investigation, Information, Interview, Inspection, Interaction, Immersion, Indexing, Interpretation, Iteration, Instantiation, and Integration. Instagram's active personal pages on the topic of everyday life were considered as the unit of analysis. These page owners were primarily a blogger and some of them were influencers or micro-celebrities. According to this, the pages of Instagram horns or celebrities were not included in this research. The main data has been extracted from users’ captions or comments. The fifty pages with the highest rate of posts have been analyzed as Kozinets advised and their number of followers varied between fifty thousand to three hundred and fifty thousand. These criteria were considered for selection: the page owner displayed a meaningful narrative of her or his daily life in the rich texts, the page owner shared at least one post daily, and the page owner shared posts which are encouraged users to participate in the commenting, the page has a high number of followers, the page gets a high number of comments and replies, the page owner has been famous among the daily life Instagrammers. The tools of data acquisition were participant observation for two years and interviews with the page owners. Description and analysis of findings show that Instagrammers who have daily life pages present an ideal image of their lifestyle, condition, and personality which has formed to “I am good” story. These images in the material dimension refer to consumerism as a valuable symbol of upper-class people. Also, there are interconnections between the methods which are used to access satisfaction in daily life. It seems users are searching for ideals in the virtual space because of the inefficiency and deterrence of political and social situations in the real space. Although users choose the virtual space to share their opinions and feelings and experiences optionally, they try to display and protect optimal and trustworthy network image of themselves. According to this, users’ behaviors in some kinds of contexts (challenging topics especially political and religious subjects) imply self-direction. They are trying to show themselves as the right side and another one as the unfair side and they accuse other positions and they curse their opponents. This position is visible in four fields: the challenging macro issues (such as trust in a government official, election, foreign policy, laws related to women, crisis management, betrayal of spouses, Hijab in Islam, limitations of individual freedom in the public arena, street protest, environmental protection), the issues which show differences in lifestyles, the situation of privacy protection, the difference in interpretation. The users can’t keep their polite appearances in those fields. Although, the page owners try to keep calm, but others don’t try it because they are often anonymous, unlike the page owners. In other contexts (such as the critical or landmark conditions) imply to collectivism which is referred to as “networked individualism”. In-group collectivism has been formed based on the image of “I am good and you are good” and it has been visible in narrative contexts of user’s daily life experiences not in discussions of social issues. General collectivism has been appearing in sensitive and difficult situations especially natural disasters and abnormal events or fateful situations to achieve common targets. Users have used the virtual space as a tool for collective movements with a special ability to organize and a context for being seen as a participant.
 

Highlights

منابع فارسی

- اجاق، سیده زهرا و میرزایی موسوی (1395). تحلیل کنش‌های ارتباطی و مدیریت تاثیر در گروه‌های تلگرام. مطالعات رسانه‌های نوین. 2 (5): 100-75.

- اسلوین، جیمز (1380). اینترنت و جامعه. ترجمه عباس گیلوری و علی رادباوه. تهران: نشر کتابدار.

- افتاده، جواد (1392). ویژگی­ها و الگوهای رسانه­های اجتماعی؛ مطالعه موردی تحلیل شبکه توییتر. پایان‌نامه کارشناسی ارشد، تهران: دانشگاه علامه طباطبایی، دانشکده علوم ارتباطات.

- انگروزینو، مایکل وی (1396). درآمدی بر مردم‌نگاری: نحوه انجام تحقیق‌های مشاهده‌ای و مردم‌نگارانه. ترجمه جبار رحمانی و محمد رسولی. تهران: پژوهشگاه فرهنگ، هنر و ارتباطات.

- بل، دیوید (1389). درآمدی بر فرهنگ­های سایبر. ترجمه مسعود کوثری و حسین حسنی. تهران: نشر جامعه شناسان.

- بل، دیوید (1390). نظریه­پردازان فرهنگ سایبری. ترجمه مهدی شفیعیان. تهران: انتشارات دانشگاه امام صادق.

- بنت، اندی (1386). فرهنگ و زندگی روزمره. ترجمه حسن چاوشیان و لیلا جوافشانی. تهران: انتشارات اختران.

-ترلو، کریسپین. تومیک، آلیس و لنگل، لورد (1390). ارتباطات کامپیوتر واسط: تعاملات اجتماعی و اینترنت. ترجمه سروناز تربتی. تهران: جامعه شناسان.

- خانیکی، هادی. بابایی، محمود (1390). فضای سایبر و شبکه­های اجتماعی، مفهوم و کارکرد. جامعه اطلاعاتی. 1 (1): 96-71.

- خانیکی، هادی. بصیریان‌جهرمی، حسین (1392). کنش‌گری و قدرت در شبکه‌های اجتماعی مجازی، مطالعه کارکردهای فیس‌بوک در فضای واقعی. علوم اجتماعی 61: 81-47.

- دوچ، مورتون و روبرت ام، کراوس (1386). نظریه­ها در روان­شناسی اجتماعی. ترجمه مرتضی کتبی. تهران: انتشارات دانشگاه تهران.

- طالبیان، حامد (1391). اینترنت، فرهنگ و زندگی روزمره دانشجویی. پایان نامه کارشناسی ارشد. تهران: دانشگاه علامه طباطبایی، دانشکده علوم ارتباطات.

- عاملی، سعید رضا (1388). متن مجازی. تهران: پژوهشکده مطالعات فرهنگی و اجتماعی.

- فراستخواه، مقصود (1395). ما ایرانیان؛ زمینه‌کاوی تاریخی و اجتماعی خلقیات ایرانی. تهران: نشر نی.

- فکوهی، ناصر (1391). فرهنگ و زندگی روزمره. تهران: انتشارات فرهنگ جاوید.

- فکوهی، ناصر و میردامادی، مهرداد (1381). فضای سایبرنتیک به مثابه فضای شهری: مطالعه موردی شهر تهران. نامه انسان­شناسی. 1 (2): 119-89.

- فلیک، اووه (1387). درآمدی بر تحقیق کیفی. ترجمه هادی جلیلی. تهران: نشر نی.

- کریبر، گلن و مارتین، رویستون (1391). فرهنگ­های دیجیتال، درک رسانه­های جدید. ترجمه وازگن سرکیسیان. تهران: مرکز تحقیقات صدا و سیما.

- گافمن، اروینگ (1392). نمود خود در زندگی روزمره. ترجمه مسعود کیانپور. چاپ دوم. تهران: نشر مرکز.

- لیندلف، تامس و تیلور، برایان (1388). روش­های تحقیق کیفی در علوم ارتباطات. ترجمه عبدالله گیویان. تهران: همشهری.

- محسنی تبریزی، علیرضا (1395). روش تحقیق کیفی در مکاتب تفسیری؛ زمینه و کاربرد. تهران: نشر اطلاعات.

- - محمدپور، احمد (1389). ضد روش: منطق و طرح در روش‌شناسی کیفی (جلد 1). تهران: انتشارات جامعه‌شناسان.

- مهدی­زاده، سیدمحمد (1389). نظریه­های رسانه، اندیشه­های رایج و دیدگاه­های انتقادی. تهران: همشهری.

- هالیدی، آدریان (1394). اجرا و نگارش پژوهش کیفی. ترجمه مهری بهار، فاطمه همدانیان، مرضیه موحدی و منیژه  زیان‌طبسی. تهران: نشر علم.

Keywords

References
Ameli, Saeed Reza (1388). Matne majazi. Research school of cultural and social studies. Tehran. [in Persian]
Angrozino, Michael (1396). Introduction: ethnography and participant observation. Jabar Rahmani & Mohammad Rasouli. Research institute of culture, art and communication. Tehran. [in Persian]
Bakardjieva, Maria (2005). Internet Society: The Internet in Everyday Life. London: Sage.
Bell, David (1389). An introduction to cybercultures. Masoud Kosari & Hossein Hosna. Jame’ shenasan. Tehran. [in Persian].
Bell, David (1390). Cyber culture theorists. Mehdi Shafiian. Imam –Sadegh University. Tehran. [in Persian]
Bennett, Andy (1386). Culture and daily life. Leila Javafshani & Hassan Chavoshian. Akhtaran. Tehran. [in Persian].
Bradley, Nigel (2013), Marketing research tools & techniques, Oxford
Brewer, John (2000). Ethnography. Buckinngham: Open University Press.
Creeber, Glen. Martin, Royston (1391). Digital cultures: Understanding new media. Vazgin Sarkisian. IRIB Research center. Tehran. [in Persian]
Deutsch, Morton. Krauss, Robert (1386). Theories in social psychology. Morteza Ketabi. Tehran University. Tehran. [in Persian]
Fakuhi, Nasser. Mirdamadi, Mehrdad (1381). Cybernetic space as an urban space: a case study of Tehran city. Anthropology letter. 1(2). 89-119. [in Persian]
Fakuhi, Nasser (1391). Farhang va zendegie rooz mare. Farhange Javid. Tehran. [in Persian]
Farasatkhah, Maqsood (1394). Ma Iranian zamine kavi tarikhi va ejtemaee kholghiyate irani. Ney. Tehran. [in Persian]
Flick, U (1387). Introduction to qualitative research. Hadi Jalili. Ney. Tehran. [in Persian].
Goffman, Irving (1392). The presentation of Self-expression in everyday life. Masoud Kianpour. Markaz. Tehran. [in Persian]
Holliday, Adryan (1394). Doing and writing qualitative research. Mehri bahar & Fatemeh Hamedanian &…. Elm. Tehran. [in Persian]
Khaniki, Hadi & Babaei, Mahmoud (1390). Cyber space and social networks: concepts and mechanism. Information Society. Tehran. 1(1): 71-96. [in Persian]
Khaniki, Hadi & Basirian Jahromi, Hossein (1392). Activism and power in virtual social networks: study of Facebook functions in real space. Social Sience. 61: 47-81. [in Persian]
Kozinets, Robert (2015). Netnograhpy: Redefined. 2nd Edition. London: Sage.
Lengel, Laura. Tomic, Alice. Thurlow, Crispin (1390). Computer mediated communication: social interaction and internet. Sarvenaz Torbati. Jame’ shenasan. Tehran. [in Persian]
Lindlof, Thomas. Taylor, Bryan (1388). Qualitative communication research methods. Abdollah Givian. Hamshahri. Tehran. [in Persian]
Mehdizadeh, Seyed Mohammad (1389). Nazariye haye resaneh andishe haye rayej va didgah haye enteghadi. Hamshahri. Tehran. [in Persian]
Mohammad pour, Ahmad (1389). Zede ravesh mantegh va tarh dar ravesh shenasiye keyfi. Jame’ shenasan. Tehran. [in Persian]
Mohseni tabrizi, Ali reza (1395). Raveshe tahghighe keyfi dar makatebe tafsiri zamineh va karbord. Etelaat. Tehran. [in Persian]
Oftadeh, Javad (1392). Characteristics and Patterns of Social Media Case Study: Twitter Network Analysis. Master’s thesis, Allameh Tabatabai University, Tehran. [in Persian]
Ojagh, Seyedeh Zahra & Mirzaei Mousavi, Seyed Rasoul (1395). Analysis of Communicative actions and Self-presentation in Telegram’s Groups. New media studies. [in Persian]
Rainie, Lee & Wellman, Barry (2012). Networked: The New Social Operating System. MIT Press.
Slevin, James (1380). The internet and society. Abass Gilvary & Ali Radbave. Ketabdar. Tehran. [in Persian]
Talebian, Hamed (1391). Internet, culture and daily student life. Master’s thesis, Allameh Tabatabai University, Tehran. [in Persian]
Turkle, Sherry (1995). Life on the Screen: Identity in the Age of the Internet. Simon & Schuster. USA.