Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

1 Lecturer at Farhangian University, expert in the supervision and evaluation of Farhangian University

2 : Professor of Measurement, Allameh Tabatabai University

3 Associate Professor, Department of Social Communication Sciences, Faculty of Communications and Media Studies, Islamic Azad University, Tehran Central Branch, Tehran, Iran

4 Associate Professor, Department of Social Communication Sciences, Faculty of Communications and Media Studies, Islamic Azad University, Central Tehran Branch, Tehran-Iran

Abstract

The present study investigates the relationship between the use of social networks with cognitive intelligence, emotional intelligence, and creativity and Personality traits in users. The research method in this study is descriptive-correlation method and, we developed a structural model by using the calculated correlation coefficients. The statistical population of the present study included all high school female students in Tehran during the academic year of 1395-96 and the sample size was selected based on Cochran formula equivalent to 400 people. The data were gathered by five questionnaires of Raven's intelligence, Bar-On Emotional Intelligence, Torrance Creativity, NEO Five-factor Personality traits, and Social Network, Researcher’s Questionnaire. Also, the analysis of the test information was done in two descriptive and inferential categories, the main results of which are as follows:
Based on the results, it was found that the direct effect of intelligence on the use of social networks is not meaningful, but the effect of intelligence on social networks with the mediation of emotional intelligence is inversely significant. Also, the results of the study indicated that the direct effect of emotional intelligence could predict the use of social networks. The research hypothesis that creativity predicts the use of social networks is not confirmed. Also, the results showed that the effect of Personality traits on social networks with the mediation of emotional intelligence is inversely significant.And emotional intelligence has a greater role in predicting the use of social networks than other cognitive variables.

Keywords

-           Bianchi Adriana. and Phillips James. (2005). Psychological Predictors of Problem Mobile Phone Use, Cyber Psychology & Behavior 8 pp. 39–51.
-           Cohen, Stanley. & Wills, Thomas. (1985). Stress, Social Support, and the Buffering Hypothesis, Psychological Bulletin, 98, 310-357
-           Crocker, Jennifer., & Wolfe, Connie . (2001). Contingencies of Self-Worth. Psychological Review, 108, 593-623.
-           Crocker, Jennifer. (2002). The Costs of Seeking Self-esteem. Journal of Social Issues, 58, 597-615.
-                  Davis. Richard (2001). A Cognitive- Behavioral Model of Pathological Internet use. Computers in Human Behavior, 17, 187-95.
-                  Diener, Eunkook., Suh, Eunkook Mark., Lucas, Richard., & Smith, Harry. (1999). Subjective Well-being: Three Decades of Progress.
-                  Hansen, Derek., Shneiderman, Ben., & Smith, Marc. (2010). Analyzing Social Media Networks with NodeXL: Insights from a Connected World.
-                  Jenkins-Guarnieri, Michael., Wright, Stephen., & Hudiburgh, Lynette. (2012). The Relationships among Attachment Style, Personality Traits, Interpersonal Competency, and Facebook Use. Journal of Applied.
-           Lacey, Nick (2002). Media Institutions and Audiences: Key Concepts in Media Studies, New York, Palgrave.
-                  Landers, Richard., & Lounsbury, John. (2006). An Investigation of Big Five and Narrow Personality Traits in Relation to Internet Usage. Computers in Human Behavior, 22(2), 283–293.
-           McCrae, Robert Roger. & Costa, Paul. (1992). Personality Trait Structure as a Human Universal. American Psychologist, 52, 5.
-           Mckenna. Katelyn.Green Amie, & Gleason Marci. (2000). Relationship Formation on the Internet what’s the Big Altraction. Journal of Social Issues, 58.9-31
-           Melts, Stephen. (1989). An Exploratory Investigation of Deception in Close Relationship. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 67-79.
-                  Muscanell, Nicole. & Guadagno, Rosanna. (2012). Make New Friends or Keep the Old: Gender and Personality Differences in Social Networking Use. Computers in Human Behavior, 28(1), 107-112.
-                  Park, Lora., Crocker, Jennifer, & Kiefer, Amy. (2007). Contingencies of Self-worth, Academic Failure, and Goal Pursuit. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 33, 1503-1517.
-                  Ryan, Tracii., & Xenos, Sophia. (2011). Who uses Facebook? An investigation into the relationship between the Big Five, shyness, narcissism, loneliness, and Facebook usage. Computers in Human Behavior,27(5), 1658-1664.
Ryan, Xenos
-           Shearer, Colonel Johnston.)2006). Exploring the Relationship Among the Multiple Intelligences and Emotional Intelligence. Unpublished Manuscript, Kent State University. Retrieved 6-9-06 from www.Miresearch.org/ files / Eqi _mi.doc
-           Verner Surin,, Tankard, Jamiz.. (2002). Communication Theories, Translated by: Alireza Dehghan, Tehran, University Press, Tehran.
-                  Swickert, Risinger., Hittner, Becca., Harris, Jennifer., & Herring, Geffen, Audrey. (2002). Relationships Among Internet Use, Personality, and Social Support. Computers in Human Behavior, 18(4), 437–451.
Zhong, Bu., Hardin, Marie., & Sun, Tao. (2011). Less Effortful Thinking Leads to More Social Networking? The Associations Between the Use of Social Network