Document Type : Research Paper

Author

Assistant Professor, Department of Basic Sciences, Army University, Tehran, Iran.

Abstract

Abstract
The development of new media, particularly interactive social networks, has been one of the most significant digital phenomena over the past few decades both in Iran and globally. The media, via its emphasis on user participation in social relationships, has brought about considerable changes to cultural, political, and economic landscapes. However, while highlighting the critical role of users in social relations, these networks may also impact social cohesion in less privileged areas, which often face stark social disparities. Among the social networks, WhatsApp is one of the most popular platforms and is widely adopted due to its interactive capabilities and lack of restrictions. Its use has also grown in Iran, especially given its high capacity for user interaction. The researcher has employed a descriptive-analytical methodology and a theoretical framework to review the impact of WhatsApp on social cohesion among less privileged areas of Tehran through a survey-based approach. Based on the data collection through the snowball method and statistical analysis using Pearson's test, it was concluded that there is a positive and significant relationship between the use of WhatsApp and both components of social cohesion (social adherence and social equality) among young users in less privileged areas of Tehran. Although the use of WhatsApp has been found to be positively associated with social equality, the impact is primarily felt with the feeling of participation. On the social cohesion component, the feeling of acceptance is heavily influenced by the use of WhatsApp, but the feeling of equality remains unchanged in less privileged areas of Tehran. Therefore, in light of this finding, it is warranted to consider the holistic and cohesive effects of this network in societal policies to effectively utilize its capabilities for enhancing the individual role-playing and to employ that potential towards reducing the cultural-social policy implementation costs.

Introduction

Modern media and communication platforms can be regarded as critical tools for the expression of various subcultures, ethnic groups, and less-privileged economic and societal groups. They serve to amplify their voices, increase their social awareness, and represent their demands. In Iran, mobile social networks like Telegram, WhatsApp, and Instagram have gained prominence and have had a significant impact on various populations, especially the youth.
Among the social networks, WhatsApp has become increasingly popular among Iranian users due to the ease of voice communication, low internet requirements, and the ability to manage voice messages; its unfiltered nature, in particular, has garnered significant support among Iranian users. However, WhatsApp usage among less privileged areas remains understudied, especially in relation to its influence on social cohesion. This social network has allowed its users to play a significant role in the interactive space and has opened up powerful possibilities for two-way communication. However, despite the diverse roles that WhatsApp plays in different societal spheres and user functions, it is unclear whether its increased individual roles, particularly in the social, economic, and political spheres, would be effective in less privileged areas, especially in relation to the sense of social equality of young users and improving their social adherence and increasing the level of social cohesion. The present research has sought to address this issue.
Research Question(s):

What is the relationship between using WhatsApp and social adherence?

1.1. What is the relationship between the use of WhatsApp and the feeling of social belonging?
2.1. What is the relationship between the use of WhatsApp and the feeling of social acceptance?
3.1. What is the relationship between using WhatsApp and adhering to the law?

What is the relationship between the use of WhatsApp and the feeling of social equality?

1.2. What is the relationship between using WhatsApp and feeling privileged?
2.2. What is the relationship between the use of WhatsApp and the feeling of participation?
3.2. What is the relationship between using WhatsApp and feeling equal?

Literature Review

Studies by Shohani and Shohani (Winter 2018) have revealed a significant correlation between social networks and the development of social trust, social cohesion, solidarity, and even political participation, via strengthening the relationships between people in those societies. Gholami and Khaiti (Fall 2013) have found a close relationship between the two variables of physical identity and social cohesion, and Imam Jumezadeh et al. (Spring 2014) have found a significant correlation between media consumption and social cohesion, and according to Farahmand et al. (Spring and Summer 2014) justice variables Social, external media, internal media and age have been able to show 22% of the changes in social cohesion.

Methodology

This study aims to examine the relationship between two variables: WhatsApp use and social cohesion. The study employs a descriptive-analytical methodology and adopts the Theory of Bernard (1999) as its theoretical framework. In order to obtain a measure of social cohesion, Bernard (1999) has outlined several dimensions such as a sense of belonging-isolation, deprivation-privilege, participating-not participating, accepting-not accepting, law-abiding-not adhering to the law. Within this research, two components of social compliance (feeling of belonging-isolation, acceptance-rejection, law-abiding-not adhering to the law) and feeling of social equality (deprivation-privilege, participation-nonparticipation, equal-unequal level) have been explored.
Due to the lack of accurate statistics on young WhatsApp users in the less privileged areas of Tehran, the sampling process employed a convenience sampling method. A research questionnaire was given to 1,200 young people in Tehran's less privileged areas, and a total of 726 participants were included in the study. After the survey was distributed to the intended participants, those who agreed to participate and answered the questions, the collected data was subjected to statistical analysis using Pearson's correlation test.

Results

With regard to the relationship between WhatsApp use and social adherence, the analysis revealed that the components of social adherence, namely the feeling of acceptance, sense of belonging, and adherence to the law, presented the highest correlations with the use of WhatsApp. In order to examine the sub-hypotheses in detail, Pearson's correlation test was also used to measure the extent of the connection between the WhatsApp usage and the three components under the social adherence variable.
The table below presents the findings of the Pearson's correlation test, in which the social adherence variable was taken as the dependent variable and the WhatsApp usage variable was taken as the independent variable. The values and significance levels of each correlation coefficient are also provided. In consideration of the fact that the p-value is lower than the 0.05 significance level, we reject the null hypothesis and conclude that there is a statistically significant relationship between the usage of WhatsApp and social adherence, with 95% confidence.




Symmetric Measures




 


Value


Asymptotic Standard Errora


Approximate Tb


Approximate Significance






Interval by Interval


Pearson's R


.263


.034


7.345


.000c




Ordinal by Ordinal


Spearman Correlation


.260


.038


7.234


.000c




N of Valid Cases


726


 


 


 




a. Not assuming the null hypothesis.




b. Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.




c. Based on normal approximation.




In terms of the relationship between WhatsApp use and the social equality variables, the analysis reveal that, while social participation and enjoyment present the highest levels of correlation, the feeling of equality can not be imagined. In other words, the feeling of equality cannot be inferred merely from people's WhatsApp usage.
The results of the Pearson's correlation analysis shown in the table below reveal that while social participation and enjoyment present the highest levels of correlation with WhatsApp use, the feeling of equality cannot be inferred from WhatsApp usage alone. Furthermore, WhatsApp usage has a low level of correlation with the feeling of equality, indicating that the two variables cannot be deemed to have a strong connection. In light of the statistical findings presented in the table and the fact that the p-value has fallen below the 0.05 significance level, we reject the null hypothesis and concluded that there is a statistically significant relationship between WhatsApp usage and feelings of social equality, with 95% confidence.




Symmetric Measures




 


Value


Asymptotic Standard Errora


Approximate Tb


Approximate Significance




Interval by Interval


Pearson's R


.307


.031


8.677


.000c




Ordinal by Ordinal


Spearman Correlation


.301


.035


8.508


.000c




N of Valid Cases


726


 


 


 




a. Not assuming the null hypothesis.




b. Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.




c. Based on normal approximation.





Conclusion

The emergence and evolution of new media and especially social networks have become a phenomenon of recent years, having altered practically all aspects of modern human society, to the extent that their elimination is hardly imaginable in the aftermath of the COVID-19 outbreak, given their increased prominence. Indeed, the impact of these social networks is categorized on a spectrum of positive and negative effects, depending on the social conditions of the countries involved. However, it is vital to consider how people perceive the usage of these social networks, which is itself influenced by governmental actions, available social facilities, and other relevant factors. It is evident that people, especially the youth in our country, as the leading users of social media, have accepted the effects of various social networks as part of their everyday lives. As traditional values hold prevalence in Iranian society, social networks can have a mixed impact on its cultural fabric. While they are primarily perceived in contrast to the prevailing culture, their positive effects are often overshadowed by their negative aspects. Although widespread cultural resistance toward social media networks has often created a negative impression of their works, such a stance tends to overlook their potential capabilities, some of which remain unexplored. Among those capacities is their potential role in influencing social cohesion and solidarity, as demonstrated by the researcher.
Recent economic challenges have exacerbated social inequality between different classes in Iranian society. This solidarity can act as a safeguard against potential unrest in less privileged areas, promote greater youth participation in social activities, and facilitate individual commitment and collective action, thereby forming a more cohesive society. In particular, the social fabric of the south and west areas of Tehran, which present lower levels of social and cultural facilities, as well as economic development, is vulnerable to social and economic inadequacies. This deficit of facilities constitutes a significant contributing factor to social tensions, particularly among the youth in these areas. The engagement of this population can therefore help offset the risk of social unrest.
As the collected survey data indicates, the use of WhatsApp by users from less privileged areas of Tehran carries a positive and significant correlation with social adherence and social equality. However, when compared, users who employ WhatsApp extensively seem to possess a stronger social adherence compared to a higher feeling of social equality. This could be explained by the fact that WhatsApp's impact on communication may not sufficiently address the varying demands of social equality, particularly for users who reside in areas facing objective social and economic difficulties.

Keywords

References
Alfirdaus, Laila Kholid & Eric Hiariej and Farsijana Adeney-Risakotta (2015), Theories Of Social Solidarity In The Situations Of (Natural) Disasters, Politika, Vol. 6, No.1.
Buchenscheit, Andreas & Könings, Bastian& Neubert, Andreas & Schaub, Florian & Schneider, Matthias & Kargl, Frank (2014), “Privacy Implications of Presence Sharing in Mobile Messaging Applications”, http://www.uniulm.de/fileadmin/website_uni_ulm/iui.inst.100/institut/Papers/Prof_Weber/2014-MUMwhatsapp- privacy.pdf.
Clifton, A. and Webster, G. D. (2017), “An Introduction to Social Network Analysis for Personality and Social Psychologists”, Social Psychological and Personality Science, Vol. 8 No. 4, pp. 442–453 https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550617709114
Creeber, Martin (2009), Digital Cultures: Understanding New Media. Open University Press.
Davies, B., & Savulescu, J. (2019), Solidarity and responsibility in health care. Public Health Ethics, 12(2), 133–144.
Douwes, renate & maria stuttaford and leslie London (2018), Social Solidarity, Human Rights, and Collective Action: Considerations in the Implementation of the National Health Insurance in South Africa, Health and Human Rights Journal, VO LU ME 20, N U M B E R 2
Edelman, M. (2018), The future of sexual harassment policies at U.S. colleges: From repeal of the 2011 DOE-OCR Guidelines to launch of the #MeToo Movement on social media. Wake Forest Law Review, 8, 12–19.
Gubanov Nikolay N. and Nikolay I. Gubanov (2018), Mental Bases of Social Solidarity, Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research, volume 283, pp. 998- 1002, Atlantis Press
Hall, Peter. (2017), "The Political Sources of Social Solidarity." In The Strains of Commitment: The Political Sources of Solidarity in Diverse Societies, 349-398. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Healy, M. (2018). Belonging, Social Cohesion and Fundamental British Values. British Journal of Educational Studies, 1-16. DOI: 10.1080/00071005.2018.1506091
Im Sik, C., Zdravko, T., and Ivan, N. (2015), Towards an Integrated Urban Space Framework For Emerging Urban. 147-168
Johnson, Phil & Michael Brookes & Geoffrey Wood & Chris Brewster (2017), Legal Origin and Social Solidarity: The Continued Relevance of Durkheim to Comparative Institutional Analysis
Kalyvas, Andreas (2008), Democracy and the politics of the extraordinary: Max Weber, Carl Schmitt, and Hannah Arendt, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Koonce, K. A. (2011). Social Cohesion as the Goal: Can Social Cohesion Be Directly Pursued? Peabody Journal of Education, 86(2), 144-154. DOI: 10.1080/0161956X.2011.561176
Kymlicka, Will (2015), Solidarity in diverse societies: beyond neoliberal multiculturalism and welfare chauvinism, Comparative Migration Studies 3:17, pp. 1-19.
Libal, Kathryn & Prakash Kashwan (2020), Solidarity in times of crisis, Journal of Human Rights, 19:5, 537-546, DOI: 10.1080/14754835.2020.1830046
MAHLER, Anne Garland (2018), From the Tricontinental to the Global South: Race, Radicalism, and Transnational Solidarity (Durham, NC: Duke University Press).
Maryani, Eni (2018), Developing Social Solidarity through Digital Media, Jurnal Komunikasi ISKI, Vol. 03 (01), 2018. 1217
Mishra, Chinmayee and Navaneeta Rath (2020), Social solidarity during a pandemic: Through and beyond Durkheimian Lens, Social Sciences & Humanities Open, pp.1-7
Mujiyati, Novita & Warto, Leo Agung.S (2017), The Strategies To Improve Social Solidarity of Senior High School Students Through History Module Based On Problems. The Journal of Education and Learning. Vol. 11 (2) pp. 130-137. DOI: 10.11591/edulearn.v11i2.5833
Nations, D. (2018, August 30), What is social media? LifeWire. Retrieved from http s://www.lifewire.com/what-is-social-media-explaining-the-big-trend-3486616.
Ochinanwata, Igwe, P. A.& C., Ochinanwata, N., Adeyeye, J. O., Ikpor, I. M., Nwakpu, S. E., Egbo, O. P., Onyishi, I. E., Vincent, O., Nwekpa, K. C., Nwakpu, K. O, Adeoye, A. A., Odika, P. O., Fakah, H., Ogunnaike, O. O. and Umemezia, E. I. (2020), Solidarity and Social Behaviour: how did this help communities to manage COVID-19 pandemic?,International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy, Nov. 2020. DOI.10.1108/IJSSP-07-2020-0276
Offer, J. (2019), “Social Solidarity and Herbert Spencer: Not the Oxymoron That Might Be Assumed”, Frontiers in Sociology, Vol.4 No.1, pp. 1- 11 https://doi.org/10.3389/fsoc.2019.00001
Paskov, M., & Dewilde, C. (2012), Income inequality and solidarity in Europe. Research in Social Stratification and Mobility, 30(4), 415–432.
Rakopoulos, T. (2016), “The other side of the crisis: solidarity networks in Greece”, Social Anthropology, Vol. 24 No. 2, pp. 142–151.
Reichlin, M. (2011), The role of solidarity in social responsibility for health. Medicine, Healthcare & Philosophy, 14(4), 365–370.
Ricciardelli, Lauren A. & Larry Nackerud & Adam E. Quinn & Mary Sewell & Beatrice Casiano (2020), Social media use, attitudes, and knowledge among social work students:Ethical implications for the social work profession, Social Sciences & Humanities Open 2, 100008, pp. 1-9, Published by Elsevier Ltd.
Susanka, Tomas. (2017), “Security Analysis of the Telegram IM”. Master thesis, University in Prague, Retrieved Jul,2016,from: http://www.susanka.eu/files/master- thesis.
Terpstra, Martijn (2013), “WhatsApp & privacy”,http://www.cs.ru.nl/bachelorscripties, Martijn_Terpstra 0814962 WhatsApp_and_privacy.pdf.
Toineno, F. O., Akhyar, M., & Suryani, N. (2019), Social Solidarity Of Students In State SMA Kupang City. Advances in Social Sciences Research Journal, 6(11) 136-143.
Wilde, Lawrence (2013), Global Solidarity (Edinburgh, Scotland: Edinburgh University Press).
References (In Persian)
Iftikhar, Zohra and Ziyai, Soraya and Sharif Moghadam, Hadi (Spring 1401), "New Media in Islamic Science Research: A Case Study in Seminaries", New Media Studies Quarterly, 8th year, No. 29, pp. 366-394. (In Persian)
Imam Jumezadeh, Seyyed Javad and Zahra Sadeghi Naqd Ali and Mahmoudreza Rehbargazi and Seyed Morteza Yaru Baghban (Spring 2012), "Investigating the relationship between media consumption and social cohesion (a case study of young people in Tabriz city)", Socio-Cultural Development Studies, Volume 1, Number 4, pp. 9- 31. (In Persian)
Heydari, Asghar (winter 1400), "New media and strategies to achieve the goals of the tourism development vision document", New Media Studies Quarterly, 7th year, No. 28, pp. 375-402. (In Persian)
Khanmohammadi, Karim and Aliakbar Shamali (Autumn 2015), "Islamic ethics of privacy in cyber social networks (with emphasis on WhatsApp)", Islam and Social Studies, No. 14, pp. 80-103. (In Persian)
Delavar, Ali and Ali Akbar Farhani and Behzad Karimi (Fall 2018), "WhatsApp and its users' lived experience (case study: young adults in Tehran)", Media, No. 116, pp. 5-25. (In Persian)
Rait, Amin, Mahosh Zainizadeh, and Samieh Emadi (Summer 2014), "Social Media Marketing Impact: The Impact of WhatsApp Update Status in a University Extracurricular Sports Event", Communication Management in Sports Media, No. 8, pp. 46-38. (In Persian)
Zubiri, Hoda and Zahra Karimi Moghari (Spring 2013), "The effect of social cohesion on economic development (a cross-country study with a panel data approach)", Economic Growth and Development Research, 4th year, No. 14, pp. 39-62. (In Persian)
Shabiri, Seyyed Mohammad (Spring 2017), "The role of social networks on the promotion of teachers' environmental culture: a case study of WhatsApp", research in school and virtual learning, No. 20, pp. 93-100. (In Persian)
Shohani, Ahmad and Nader Shohani (Winter 2018), "Measuring and analyzing the impact of social capital on people's political participation (case study of Ilam city)", Islamic World Political Research, 9th year, 4th issue, pp. 1-25. (In Persian)
Gholami, Mohammad and Aqeel Hayati (Autumn 2012), "Investigation of the impact of physical identity on social cohesion, a case study of Evin neighborhood in Tehran", Applied Research in Geographical Sciences, Year 13, Number 30, pp. 131-150. (In Persian)
Farahmand, Mahnaz and Seyyed Mohsen Saeedi Madani and Mahnaz Sahandi Khalifa Kandi (spring and summer 2014), "Comparative study of social cohesion between Azeri and Kurdish ethnic groups (case study: Sanandaj and Tabriz cities)", Iranian Social Issues Review, Volume 6, Number 1, pp. 122-95. (In Persian)
Ghorbani, Ebrahim (Spring 2017), "The relationship between social cohesion and attitude towards drug and psychotropic drug trafficking among the border residents of Piranshahr city", Border Studies, 6th year, 1st issue, pp. 1-21. (In Persian)
Karmi, Azadullah and Hojatoleh Almasi (summer 2014), "Review and comparison of Viber and WhatsApp capabilities in higher education", Educational Technology and Learning, No. 3, pp. 37-55. (In Persian)
Karimi-Moghari, Zahra, Ismail Abunouri, and Hoda Zubiri (Fall 2013), "Fuzzy analysis of social cohesion and its relationship with economic development", Economic Research, Volume 49, Number 3, pp. 621-645. (In Persian)
Kayhan, Amir and Farqani, Mohammad Mahdi and Mozafari, Afsana (Winter 2017), "The role of mobile media in the formation of students' ethnic identity", Quarterly Journal of the Iranian Association for Cultural and Communication Studies, 14th year, No. 53, pp. 249-284. (In Persian)
Mohammadi-Turkmani, Ehsan, Ali Al-Bahadli, Faiza Rasouli, and Qadratullah Bagheri (spring and summer 2017), "The effect of sports on the social cohesion of Iraqis living in Qom province", research in educational sports, number 14, pp. 255-276. (In Persian)
Mohammadizadeh, Nasreen and Hamid Majdi and Zahra Sadat Saideh Zarabadi (Fall 2018), "The role of neighborhood demarcation in its social integration and integration (a case study of the border of Mozaffari and Al-Ghadir neighborhoods in Kerman)", Human Geography Research, Volume 51, Number 3, pp. 603 -624. (In Persian)