Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

1 PhD Student of Assessment and Measurement (Psychometrics), Department of Assessment and Measurement, Allameh Tabatabaei University, Tehran, Iran.

2 Associate Professor, Department of Clinical Psychology, Islamic Azad University, Ghods Branch, Tehran, Iran

3 Associate Professor of Psychiatry, Tehran Institute of Psychiatry- school of Behavioral Sciences and Mental Health,(Addiction Department) Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.

4 PhD student in Sociology of Social Groups, University of Tehran Markaz, Tehran, Iran

Abstract

Information and commun Virtual social networks have become the most similar to human society with the process of information explosion that they have undertaken and have become an important and influencing factor in couples' relationships. The aim of the present study was to identify the role of virtual social space in the relationships of couples referring to the family court, especially its effect on the functioning of the family and their mental health. The current research was among qualitative researches and three types of open, central and selective coding were used to analyze the data. The statistical population of the current study included couples referring to family courts, who were purposefully sampled and interviewed. The tool used in the present study was a structured and semi-structured interview. From the analysis of the conducted interviews, 207 open codes were obtained, among which 8 main themes were extracted to express the lived experiences of the interviewees, which included: "Internet addiction", "covering the emotional and mental void", etc. The result of the study showed that social-virtual space plays an important role in the process of socialization and re-socialization of couples; which, along with other factors, stabilize different attitudes and thoughts and also have a significant impact on their mental health. In summary, it can be concluded that excessive use of media, especially social virtual space, can cause many harms, including excessive dependence on technology, separation and loneliness, internet addiction, depression and boredom, psychological, physical, economic, etc. be in pairs.and boredom, and psychological, physical issues in couples
Introduction
Information and Communication Technology (ICT), particularly social media networks, has significantly enhanced its influence on family dynamics, owing to its evolving utilization objectives and its ever-growing penetration. The significance of these platforms is highlighted across the family unit, owing to their extensive presence. In fact, virtual social networks, with the exponential growth they have experienced, bear a striking resemblance to the human society at large, and thus, exert a significant influence on marital relations. Studies have demonstrated the pivotal role of Information and Communication Technology (ICT) in the structure and daily routines of couples. In particular, its importance emerges in areas of communication, relationship development, education, work-life balance, leisure time, parenting styles, and others. In light of this, concentrating on identifying shortcomings, gaps, and risks associated with ICT usage in relation to the performance and functioning of couples becomes exceedingly pertinent.
Literature Review
Nowadays, families face a myriad of technologies, particularly the introduction of Information and Communication Technology (ICT) to their homes. Stevenson (2011) acknowledges that its initial introduction is for educational aims, yet it soon extends to other spheres of socio-cultural life. While the multipurpose nature of ICT enables ease of life, it also breeds disputes among family members. Ghazanfar et al. (2015) assert that the application of ICT can modify the institution of the family itself, as well as its phases of development. Stress and other health-related concerns, safety issues, privacy infringements, access to inappropriate content, reduced social interactions, decreased family gatherings, and changes in dietary habits have become a frequent occurrence in the structure of modern families, arising out of their extensive reliance on Information and Communication Technology (ICT). The number of users of this medium had been estimated at a threshold spanning between 150 to 180 million people in 1999. The figure elevated to over 200 million people in 2002, surpassing 1.5 billion people in 2008 and surpassed 2.4 billion people in 2012, exceeding 2.7 billion people in 2016, and surpassed 3.5 billion people by 2018. Thus, social media platforms have reached a state of widespread adoption and proliferation across all facets of society, culminating in the emergence of new patterns within marital relationships.
Methodology
It is necessary to understand the impact that social media networks have on the relationships of couples attending family courts. In this context, the present study constituted qualitative research and adopted thematic analysis to analyse the data collected. The initial sampling pool consisted of 27 couples (15 males and 12 females) attending family courts, among whom 24 individuals ultimately participated in the study. For this study, structured and semi-structured interviews were utilized as the main tools for data collection. The key questions are:
How have social media platforms impacted the functioning of couples?
What are the background factors associated with excessive usage of social media networks?
What could be the repercussions of the excessive utilization of social media networks?
Results
Upon analysing the transcribed interviews, a total of 207 open codes were derived. These open codes were grouped into seven essential themes, each depicting the realities that the interviewees experienced, namely: "Internet addiction"; "Covering the emotional and mental void"; "Non-recognition"; "Online sexual activities"; "Expansion of entertainment through social networks"; "Psychological and sociological problems" and "Distorted perception of reality.
The results of the present investigative study reveal a wide array of positive and negative impacts of extensive usage of virtual social media networks on interpersonal relationships. While digital platforms can enable communication and enhance communication for partners, such networks can, simultaneously, cause a loss of trust and communication between them. In addition, the results revealed that the availability and ease of accessibility of social media platforms can increase the likelihood of engaging in extra-marital online sexual activities, which can generate feelings of betrayal and distrust, causing an eventual breakup. Internet addiction, furthermore, was recognized as a significant drawback of virtual media networks in family functioning, and it is associated with adverse psychological and social repercussions, such as depression, anxiety, and decreased social support. Social media platforms can also lead to distortions of reality and unrealistic expectations within a relationship. Curated online profiles may lead to the presentation of idealized and filtered images and details about one's life, creating unrealistic expectations and feelings of inadequacy among partners. This, in turn, can lessen satisfaction and increase tensions in the relationship. The results of the present study revealed that virtual social spaces can contribute to the process of socialization and re-socialization of couples, and this, along with other factors, can potentially result in altering attitudes and perspectives and can also affect mental health.
Conclusion
The widespread and multidimensional advancement of internet communication has introduced various challenges and issues to our contemporary existence. In spite of providing numerous benefits, such platforms can pave the path for the dissemination of misinformation, leading to the challenge and subversion of basic values. Social media networks, with their insidious influence, have altered human relationships to an unprecedented extent, enabling the control and manipulation of public opinions, fostering social unrest, and even instigating conflicts and crises. Excessive usage of media, primarily of virtual social platforms, has the potential to spark and exacerbate a plethora of harmful effects on marital relationships, including excessive reliance on technology, separation, and feelings of loneliness, internet addiction, depression, and boredom, on top of causing personal, familial, relational, emotional, psychological, physical, economic, and other difficulties within couples.

Keywords

References
Abazari, Z., Mazidi Sharafabadi, A. M., & Hashemi, S. (2021). Impact of Social Networks on Citizenship Education of Young Generation in the Context of Islamic Republic of Iran: A Lived Experience. Iranian Journal of Comparative Education, 4(2), 1159-1177.
Abbas, H. A. (2021). Effects of personality disorders and attitudes towards social networking services: evidence from family business successors in the Arab world. Journal of Family Business Management.
Afolaranmi, A. O. (2020). Social Media and Marital Choices: Its Implications on Contemporary Marriage. IGWEBUIKE: An African Journal of Arts and Humanities, 6(4), 130-153.
Ali, S., Islam, N., Rauf, A., Din, I. U., Guizani, M., & Rodrigues, J. J. (2018). Privacy and security issues in online social networks. Future Internet, 10(12), 114.
Ali, S., Saeed, M. H., Aldreabi, E., Blackburn, J., De Cristofaro, E., Zannettou, S., & Stringhini, G. (2021). Understanding the Effect of Deplatforming on Social Networks. 13th ACM Web Science Conference 2021,
Bacigalupe, G., & Lambe, S. (2011). Virtualizing intimacy: Information communication technologies and transnational families in therapy. Family process, 50(1), 12-26.
Bandura, A. (1997). The nature and structure of self-efficacy. In his Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. 35-80. In: New York, NY: Freeman Company.
Bandura, A. (2006). Adolescent development from an agentic perspective. Self-efficacy beliefs of adolescents, 5(1-43).
Bessarab, A., Mitchuk, O., Baranetska, A., Kodatska, N., Kvasnytsia, O., & Mykytiv, G. (2021). Social Networks as a Phenomenon of the Information Society. Journal of Optimization in Industrial Engineering, 14(1), 35-42.
Bobrova, L. (2021). Positive and Negative Aspects of the Social Media Influence on Value Orientations in Adolescence. Publishing House “Baltija Publishing”.
Brady, K. P., Holcomb, L. B., & Smith, B. V. (2010). The use of alternative social networking sites in higher educational settings: A case study of the e-learning benefits of Ning in education. Journal of interactive online learning, 9(2).
Broderick, C. B. (1993). Understanding family process: Basics of family systems theory. Sage.
Bryant, J., & Oliver, M. B. (2009). Media effects: Advances in theory and research. Routledge.
Buzi, R. S., Madanay, F. L., & Fujimoto, K. (2021). Sexual and social networks, venue attendance, and HIV risk among young men who have sex with men. AIDS care, 33(5), 639-644.
CĂLIN, M. F., SANDU, M. L., & Tastaman, C. I. (2021). The Relationship between Time Spent on Social Networks and the Level of Anxiety and Depression in Adolescents. Year XVII-no. 1/2021, 163.
Caplan, S. E. (2003). Preference for online social interaction: A theory of problematic Internet use and psychosocial well-being. Communication research, 30(6), 625-648.
Caprara, G. V., Regalia, C., Scabini, E., Barbaranelli, C., & Bandura, A. (2004). Assessment of filial, parental, marital, and collective family efficacy beliefs. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 20(4), 247-261.
Cheal, D. (2002). Sociology of family life. Springer.
Chibli, M. (2021). Future Sociability in Public Spaces. The Dialectics of Urban and Architectural Boundaries in the Middle East and the Mediterranean, 211-239.
Clark, L. S. (2009). Digital media and the generation gap: Qualitative research on US teens and their parents. Information, Communication & Society, 12(3), 388-407.
Conti, M., Hasani, A., & Crispo, B. (2011). Virtual private social networks. Proceedings of the first ACM conference on Data and application security and privacy,
Corrie, S., & Callanan, M. M. (2001). Therapists' beliefs about research and the scientist‐practitioner model in an evidence‐based health care climate: A qualitative study. British Journal of Medical Psychology, 74(2), 135-149.
Daneback, K., Cooper, A., & Månsson, S.-A. (2005). An Internet study of cybersex participants. Archives of sexual behavior, 34(3), 321-328.
Elsayed, W. (2021). The negative effects of social media on the social identity of adolescents from the perspective of social work. Heliyon, 7(2), e06327.
Galvin, K., Dickson, F., & Marrow, S. (2006). Systems theory: Patterns and (W) holes in family communication. In engaging theories in family communication—Multiple perspectives. In: Thousand Oaks, California: Sage Publications, Inc.
Ghazanfar, S., Zeeshan, M., Kifayat, U., Shehnaz, S., & Hussain, M. (2015). Changes in family values due to information communication technologies. Explorer, 1(10), 385-389.
Gholamzadeh Bafghi, T., & Jamali Bafghi, T. (2018). Study of the relationship between membership in virtual social networks and marital satisfaction among married women and men. jiera, 12(Special Issue), 1151-1165.
Haddon, L. (2011). Domestication analysis, objects of study, and the centrality of technologies in everyday life. Canadian journal of communication, 36(2), 311-323.
Harrison, R. A., Bradshaw, J., Forrester‐Jones, R., McCarthy, M., & Smith, S. (2021). Social networks and people with intellectual disabilities: A systematic review. Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities, 34(4), 973-992.
Huisman, S., Edwards, A., & Catapano, S. (2012). The impact of technology on families. International Journal of Education and Psychology in the Community, 2(1), 44-62.
Humphreys, L. (2005). Cellphones in public: social interactions in a wireless era. New Media & Society, 7(6), 810-833.
Igartua, J.-J., & Moral, F. (2012). Psicología de los medios: panorama y perspectivas. Escritos de Psicología (Internet), 5(3), 1-3.
Jadidi, M., Ahmadrad, F., Sarkeshikian, S. S., & Moradpoor, M. S. (2023). Validation of gambling related cognitions scale-Iranian version (GRCS-IR). Addiction & Health, 15(4), 275.
Kalpidou, M., Costin, D., & Morris, J. (2011). The relationship between Facebook and the well-being of undergraduate college students. CyberPsychology, behavior, and social networking, 14(4), 183-189.
Kim, J. H., Lau, C., Cheuk, K. K., Kan, P., Hui, H. L., & Griffiths, S. M. (2010). Brief report: predictors of heavy Internet use and associations with health‐promoting and health risk behaviors among Hong Kong university students. Journal of adolescence, 33(1), 215-220.
Kostromina, S. N., & Odintsova, M. M. (2021). Semantics of life models in the information field of social networks.
Lanigan, J. D. (2009). A sociotechnological model for family research and intervention: How information and communication technologies affect family life. Marriage & Family Review, 45(6-8), 587-609.
Lawlor, K., De Róiste, Á., & Devlin, M. (2007). Young people in contemporary Ireland. Gill & Macmillan.
Lazakidou, A. A. (2012). Virtual communities, social networks and collaboration (Vol. 15). Springer Science & Business Media.
Lou, L. L., Yan, Z., Nickerson, A., & McMorris, R. (2012). An examination of the reciprocal relationship of loneliness and Facebook use among first-year college students. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 46(1), 105-117.
Luppicini, R., & Alotaibi, S. (2021). A Systematic Research Review of Internet Addiction and Identity. International Journal of Cyber Behavior, Psychology and Learning (IJCBPL), 11(1), 1-19.
Mani, A., Varshney, L., & Pentland, A. P. (2021). Quantization games on social networks and language evolution. IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing.
Mascheroni, G. (2014). Parenting the mobile internet in Italian households: Parents' and children's discourses. Journal of Children and Media, 8(4), 440-456.
Mesch, G. S. (2006). Family characteristics and intergenerational conflicts over the Internet. Information, Communication & Society, 9(4), 473-495.
Millham, M. H., & Atkin, D. (2018). Managing the virtual boundaries: Online social networks, disclosure, and privacy behaviors. New Media & Society, 20(1), 50-67.
Pagán, F. J. B., Martínez, J. L., Máiquez, M. C. C., & Reche, I. S. C. (2021). Participation in social networks by secondary school students. Educación XX1, 24(1), 1-20.
Pearson, E. (2009). All the World Wide Web’sa stage: The performance of identity in online social networks. First Monday.
Pianese, T., & Belfiore, P. (2021). Exploring the social networks’ use in the health-care industry: a multi-level analysis. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(14), 7295.
Pouresmaeil, M., Shahrokhi, A., Hosseinzadeh, K., Ziapour, A., & Rahimi, F. (2021). Presence in virtual social networks and health promoting behaviors of medical students. Journal of Public Health, 29(6), 1463-1469.
Procentese, F., & Gatti, F. (2019). People‐nearby applications and local communities: Questioning about individuals’ loneliness and social motivations toward people‐nearby applications. Journal of Community Psychology, 47(5), 1282-1294.
SaberiZafarghandi, M. B., ahmadrad, F., jadidi, M., sarkeshikian, S. A., & karimkhani, F. (2023). Development and validation of the Social Media Sites Addiction Scale in Iran (SMSAS-IR). Quarterly of Educational Measurement, 13(51), -. doi: 10.22054/jem.2023.67445.3365. (in Persian)
Scotto di Luzio, S., Procentese, F., & Guillet-Descas, E. (2014). La relazione allenatore-atleta in adolescenza: implicazioni per il benessere percepito: uno studio qualitativo. La relazione allenatore-atleta in adolescenza: implicazioni per il benessere percepito: uno studio qualitativo, 50-72.
Sechi, C., Loi, G., & Cabras, C. (2021). Addictive internet behaviors: The role of trait emotional intelligence, self‐esteem, age, and gender. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 62(3), 409-417.
Seyedfatemi, N., Asl, M. A., Bahrami, R., & Haghani, H. (2021). The effect of the virtual social network-based psycho-education on the hope of family caregivers of clients with severe mental disorders. Archives of Psychiatric Nursing, 35(3), 290-295.
Stevenson, O. (2011). From public policy to family practices: Researching the everyday realities of families' technology use at home. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 27(4), 336-346.
Villegas, A. (2013). The influence of technology on family dynamics. Proceedings of the New York State Communication Association, 2012(1), 10.
Wait, D., & White, J. M. (1999). Computers and the family life: A family development perspective. Journal of Comparative Family Studies, 30(1), 1-15.
Wajcman, J., Bittman, M., & Brown, J. E. (2008). Families without borders: Mobile phones, connectedness and work-home divisions. Sociology, 42(4), 635-652.
Wu, J., Qu, J., & Yu, G. (2021). Behavior prediction based on interest characteristic and user communication in opportunistic social networks. Peer-to-Peer Networking and Applications, 14(2), 1006-1018.
Zaphiris, P.  (N.D). Simulating social networks of online communities: simulation as a method for sociability design.
Zavaleta-Valenzuela, R. F., MendezVergaray, J., Hinostroza, L. D. V., Flores, E., & Huayta-Franco, Y. J. (2021). Impact of social network addiction in adolescents. Review. Turkish Journal of Computer and Mathematics Education (TURCOMAT), 12(6), 4234-4239.