- Amichai-Hamburger, Y., & Ben-Artzi, E. (2003). Loneliness and Internet use. Computers in human behavior, 19(1), 71-80.
- Atewell, P.,& Battle, P. A. J. (1999). Home computers and school performance. The information society, 15(1), 1-10.
- Barrera, M., Chassin, L., & Rogosch, F. (1993). Effects of social support and conflict on adolescent children of alcoholic and nonalcoholic fathers. Journal of personality and social psychology, 64(4), 602.
- Berardo, F. (1998). Family privacy: Issues and concepts. Journal of Family Issues, 118, 4–19.
- Bovill, Moria and Sonia M. Livingstone. 2001. “Bedroom Culture and the Privatisation of Media Use” [online]. London: LSE Research Online.
- Bronfenbrenner, U. (1986). Ecology of the family as a context for human development: Research perspectives. Developmental psychology, 22(6), 723.
- Bubolz, M. M., & Sontag, M. S. (2009). Human ecology theory. In Sourcebook of family theories and methods (pp. 419-450). Springer, Boston, MA.
- Buckingham, D. (2013). After the death of childhood. John Wiley & Sons.
- Carvalho, J., Francisco, R., & Relvas, A. P. (2015). Family functioning and information and communication technologies: How do they relate? A literature review. Computers in Human Behavior, 45, 99-108.
- Collier, K. M., Coyne, S. M., Rasmussen, E. E., Hawkins, A. J., Padilla-Walker, L. M., Erickson, S. E., & Memmott-Elison, M. K. (2016). Does parental mediation of media influence child outcomes? A meta-analysis on media time, aggression, substance use, and sexual behavior. Developmental psychology, 52(5), 798.
- Daly, K. J. (1996). Families and time: Keeping pace in a hurried culture. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
- DiMaggio, P., Hargittai, E., Neuman, W. R., & Robinson, J. P. (2001). Social implications of the Internet. Annual review of sociology, 27(1), 307-336.
- Fikkers, K. M., Piotrowski, J. T., & Valkenburg, P. M. (2017). A matter of style? Exploring the effects of parental mediation styles on early adolescents’ media violence exposure and aggression. Computers in Human Behavior, 70, 407-415.
- Fischer, C. S. (1992). America calling: A social history of the telephone to 1940. Univ of California Press.
- Haddon, L. (2006). The contribution of domestication research to in-home computing and media consumption. The information society, 22(4), 195-203.
- Haddon, L., & Mante-Meijer, E. (2016). Parental mediation of internet use: Evaluating family relationships. In Generational use of new media (pp. 31-48). Routledge.
- Hampton, K. N., & Wellman, B. (1999). Examining community in the digital neighborhood: early results from Canada’s wired suburb. In Digital cities (pp. 194-208). Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg.
- Hertlein, K. M. (2012). Digital dwelling: Technology in couple and family relationships. Family Relations, 61(3), 374-387.
- Howard, P. E., Rainie, L., & Jones, S. (2001). Days and nights on the Internet: The impact of a diffusing technology. American Behavioral Scientist, 45(3), 383-404.
- Hughes, Jr., R. & Hans, J. D. (2004). Understanding the effects of the Internet on family life. In Handbook of contemporary families (pp. 506-520). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
- Katz, J. E., & Aspden, P. (1997). A nation of strangers. Communications of the ACM, 40(12), 81–86.
- Katz, J.E. and Rice, R. (2002) Social Consequences of Internet Use, Boston: MIT press.
- Kiesler, S., Zdaniuk, B., Lundmark, V., & Kraut, R. (2000). Troubles with the Internet: The dynamics of help at home. Human-computer interaction, 15(4), 323-351.
- Kildare, C. A., & Middlemiss, W. (2017). Impact of parents mobile device use on parent-child interaction: A literature review. Computers in Human Behavior, 75, 579-593.
- Kraut, R., Kiesler, S., Boneva, B., Cummings, J., Helgeson, V., & Crawford, A. (2002). Internet paradox revisited. Journal of social issues, 58(1), 49-74.
- Kraut, R., Mukhopadhyay, T., Szczypula, J., Kiesler, S., & Scherlis, B. (1999). Information and communication: Alternative uses of the Internet in households. Information Systems Research, 10(4), 287-303.
- Kraut, R., Patterson, M., Lundmark, V., Kiesler, S., Mukiphadhyay, T., & Scherlis, W. (1998) ‘Internet Paradox: A Social Technology that Reduces Social Involvement and Psychological Well Being?’, American Psychologist 53: 1011-1031.
- Lenhart, A., Madden, M., & Hitlin, P. (2005). Teens and technology.Washington, DC: Pew and American Life Project.
- Lenhart, A., Rainie, L., & Lewis, O. (2001). Teenage life online: The rise of the instant-message generation and the Internet's impact on friendships and family relationships.
- Livingstone, S., & Bober, M. (2004). UK children go online. London: London School of Economics.
- Lynd, R. S., & Lynd, H. M. (1929). Middletown. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
- McGrath, S. (2012). The impact of new media technologies on social interaction in the household. Electronic Culture and Social Change.
- Mesch, G. S. (2003). The family and the Internet: The Israeli case. Social Science Quarterly, 84(4), 1038-1050.
- Mesch, G. S. (2006). Family characteristics and intergenerational conflicts over the Internet. Information, Communication & Society, 9(4), 473-495.
- Mesch, G. S. (2006). Family relations and the Internet: Exploring a family boundaries approach. The Journal of Family Communication, 6(2), 119-138.
- Morrison, M., & Krugman, D. M. (2001). A look at mass and computer mediated technologies: Understanding the roles of television and computers in the home. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 45(1), 135-161.
- Newzoo. (2018). Top 50 Countries/Markets by Smartphone Users and Penetration, Retrieved 2018-12-05 at https://newzoo.com/insights/rankings/top-50-countries-by-smartphone-penetration-and-users/
- Ogburn, W. F., & Nimkoff, M. F. (1955). Technology and the changing family. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
- Orlean s, M., & Laney, M. C., (2000). Early adolescent social networks and computer use. Social Science Computer Review, 18, 56-72.
- Padilla‐Walker, L. M., Coyne, S. M., & Fraser, A. M. (2012). Getting a high‐speed family connection: associations between family media use and family connection. Family Relations, 61(3), 426-440.
- Pasquier, D., Buzzi, C., d'Haenens, L., & Sjöberg, U. (1998). Family lifestyles and media use patterns: An analysis of domestic media among Flemish, French, Italian and Swedish children and teenagers. European Journal of Communication, 13(4), 503-519.
- Plowman, L., McPake, J., & Stephen, C. (2008). Just picking it up? Young children learning with technology at home. Cambridge Journal of Education, 38(3), 303-319.
- Rheingold, H. (1993). The virtual community: Homesteading on the electronic frontier. Reading, MA: Addison Wesley.
- Salaff, J. W. (2002). Where home is the office: The new form of flexible work. In The Internet in everyday life (pp. 464–495). Oxford, England: Blackwell.
- Silverstone, R., & Haddon, L. (1996). Design and Domestication of Information and Communication Technologies: Technical change and everyday life. In Communication by Design: The Politics of Information and Communication Technologie(pp.44-74). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- Smetana, J. G. (1988). Adolescents' and parents' conceptions of parental authority. Child development, 321-335.
- Stoll, C. (1995). Silicon snake oil. New York: Doubleday.
- Subrahmanyam, K., Greenfield, P., Kraut, R. and Gross, E. (2001) ‘The Impact of Computer Use on Children’s and Adolescents’ Development’, Applied Developmental Psychology. 22: 7-30.
- Venkatesh, A. & Vitalari, N. (1985). “Households and technology: The Case of Home Computers-Some Conceptual and Theoretical Issues.” in Marketing to the Changing Household (pp. 187-203). Ballinger Publishing.
- Villegas, A. (2013). The influence of technology on family dynamics. Proceedings of the New York State Communication Association, 2012(1), 10.
- Wellman, B., Haase, A. Q., Witte, J., & Hampton, K. (2001). Does the Internet increase, decrease, or supplement social capital? Social networks, participation, and community commitment. American behavioral scientist, 45(3), 436-455.
- Yoon, K. (2006). Local sociality in young people’s mobile communications: A Korean case study. Childhood, 13(2), 155-174.