Qualitative Content Analysis of the most visited websites in Health: Persuasive Content for Changing Smoking Behavior

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors
zahra ojagh 1
Amin Ramezanali 2
1 IHCS
2 Department of Cultural Studies and Communication, Institute for Humanities and Cultural Studies
10.22054/nms.2019.31954.476
Abstract
It seems that media and virtual spaces may persuade public to make change the smoking behavior as an interfering factor. This paper wants to recognize writing criteria in persuasive health related content, and to assess Iranian health websites which produce and distribute smoking related texts by regarding recognized criteria. For this, it synthesizes planed behavior theory (PBT) and persuasion theory to make distinguish persuasive criteria for changing behavior. Then, by considering these 16 categories as effective and by using qualitative approach and directed qualitative content analysis, the smoking related content in eight websites between April 2017 and December 2017 are analyzed. The overall number of smoking-related texts is 67 cases. Data are analyzed by MAXQDA 10. Findings show that health-related texts have low ability to make change in smoking behavior among smoker audiences. Fear, quotation, and brief-clear concluding have more frequency than other 13 criteria. So, their potential to make change in audience attitude is low. To increase their changing ability, it is needed that content providers consider other 13 criteria, too.
Keywords
Health Communication
Health - related information
Planned Behavior Theory
Persuasion Theory
Health Websites
Quit Smoking
-          Ajzen, I. 1991. The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Process.No. 50(1). Pp:179- 211.
-          Ajzen, I., & M. Fishbein. 2003. "Questions raised by a reasoned action approach: Comment on Ogden". Health Psychology. No.23 (4). pp:431-434.
-          Cho,S. 2006. Net work news coverage of breast cancer, 1974-2003. Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly,No.83(1). Pp:116-130.
-          Hinnant, A.2009. Getting the science right: An experiment on how readers evaluate medical news coverage in magazine health journalism, Journal of Health and Mass Communication, No.1 (1/2).pp: 58-77.
-          Johnston, M. 2011. "CMS or WCM - Which is Which?".Available at: https://www.cmscritic.com/cms-or-wcm-which-is-which/ cmscritic.com.
-          Neuendorf, K.A. 2011. Content Analysis – A methodological primer for gender research. Sex Roles. No. 64 (3-4). PP: 276-289.
-          Peters, G.J.Y.; Kok, G.; Abraham, C. 2008. Social cognitive determinants of ecstasy use to target in evidence-based interventions: a meta-analytical review. Addiction. No.103(1), pp:109-118.
New Media Studies
Volume 4, Issue 16
Winter 2018
Pages 264-299