نوع مقاله : مقاله علمی پژوهشی

نویسنده

استادیار پژوهشکده مطالعات فرهنگی و ارتباطات، پژوهشگاه علوم انسانی و مطالعات فرهنگی، تهران، ایران.

چکیده

در سال 1396 بحث تصویب قانون منع واردات محصولات تراریخته موجب گرم شدن مباحثات عمومی درباره زیست ‌فناوری کشاورزی شد. رسانه‌ها با پوشش اخبار مربوطه، بر کیفیت این مباحث و درک عمومی از این فناوری تاثیر گذاشتند. این موضوع، اهمیت مطالعه چگونگی پوشش رسانه‌ای و چارچوب‌‌ بندی اخبار زیست فناوری کشاورزی را بیشتر کرد. در این پژوهش، اخبار سه خبرگزاری پربازدید ایران برای بازه زمانی 13 ساله با روش انتمن تحلیل چارچوب شده‌اند. نتایج نشان می‌دهند که تنها 4.2 درصد از اخبار منتشر شده در حوزه زیست ‌فناوری به زیست ‌فناوری کشاورزی مربوطند و بقیه درباره زیست ‌فناوری پزشکی هستند. در بازه زمانی 1394 تا 1396 تعداد اخبار مربوط به زیست‌ فناوری کشاورزی افزایش یافته و جریان غالب خبری در هر سه خبرگزاری با رویکرد مثبت و غیرانتقادی چارچوب‌بندی شده است. چهار چارچوب شناسایی‌شده عبارتند از مدیریت زیست ‌فناوری کشاورزی، اثرات آن، جلب حمایت برای توسعه آن و درک عمومی از آن.

کلیدواژه‌ها

عنوان مقاله [English]

Framing Agricultural Biotechnology in Iranian News Agencies between 2005 and 2017

نویسنده [English]

  • SeyedehZahra Ojagh

Assistant Professor Research Institute for Cultural Studies and Communication, Institute of Humanities and Cultural Studies, Tehran, Iran.

چکیده [English]

In 2017, the debate over approving the ban on the import of transgenic crops caused increased public debates on the disadvantages or benefits of agricultural biotechnology in Iran. This increased the importance of studying how media coverage and frame agricultural biotechnology news. In this study, the news of three top Iranian news agencies over a 13-year period has been analyzed. Entman’s method is used for doing frame analysis. A review of all the biotech news shows that most of them are related to medical biotechnology and only 4.12 percent of the news covers agricultural biotechnology. The number of news on agricultural biotechnology has also increased dramatically between 2015 and 2017. All three news agencies have a non-critical and positive judgment towards this technology and its potential. The four frames identified include “management of agricultural biotechnology”, “effects of agricultural biotechnology”, “seeking support of agricultural biotechnology” and “public understanding of agricultural biotechnology”.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Agricultural biotechnology
  • Risk society
  • Frame analysis
  • News Agencies
  • Iran
منابع
اجاق، سیده زهرا؛ واعظ، سپیده (1396) "نقش سواد رسانه‌ای در حل تعارض نقشی ـ هویتی کودکان، موردمطالعه: مخاطبان کودک کارتون مرد عنکبوتی"، مجله جهانی رسانه، 12 (1): 21-39.
زردار، زرین (1393) رسانه‌ای شدن فناوری‌های نو در ایران: شکاف‌های شناختی کنشگران در بازنمایی بیوتکنولوژی در برنامه‌های تلویزیونی. پایان‌نامه دکتری، دانشگاه علامه طباطبایی.
ویکی‌پدیا. (1400). "تولید ناخالص داخلی". دانشنامه آزاد. https://fa.wikipedia.org/wiki/تولید_ناخالص_داخلی
Bauer, Martin.W. (2002) “Controversial Medical and Agri-food Biotechnology: A Cultivation Analysis,” Public Understanding of Science 11: 93–111.
Beck, Ulrich, (2006). “Living in the world risk society”, Economy and Society, 35 (3): 329-345.
Beck, Ulrich.. (1995). Ecological Enlightenment. Atlantic Highlands, NJ: Humanities Press International.
Beck, Ulrich. (1992). Risk Society-Towards a New Modernity. London: Sage.
Bonfadelli, Heinz., Dahinden, Urs., & Leonarz, Martina. (2002) “Biotechnology in Switzerland: High on the Public Agenda”, Public Understanding of Science, 11 (2):113-130.
Campbell, John. L., Quincy, Charles., Osserman, Jordan., & Pedersen, Ove. K. (2013) “Coding In-depth Semistructured Interviews”, Sociological Methods & Research, 42 (3): 294-320.
Cmeciue, C. (2017) “A Bottom-Up Discursive Approach To Genetically Modified Organisms”, Journal of Media Critices, 3 (11): 45-55.
Cottle, S imon (1998) “Ulrich Beck, 'Risk Society' and the Media.”, European Journal of Communication, 13 (1): 5-35.
Dahinden, Urs. (2002) “Biotechnology in Switzerland- Frames in a Heated Debate”, Science Communication, 24 (2): 184-197.
David, Clarissa.C.; Atun, Jenna.Mae.; Fille, Erika. & Monterola, Christopher. (2011) “Finding Frames: Comparing Two Methods of Frame Analysis”, Communication Methods and Measures, 5 (4): 329-351.
Derosier, Christopher., Sulemana, Iddisah., James, Harvey. S., Valdivia, Corinne., Folk, William & Smith, Randall. D. (2015). ” A comparative analysis of media reporting of perceived risks and banafits of genetically modified crops and foods in Kenyan and international newspapers”, Public Understanding of Science, 24 (5): 1-20.
De Vreese, Claes. H. (2005) “News framing: Theory and typology”, Information Design Journal & Document Design, 13(1): 51-62.
Entman, Robert. (1993) “Framing: Toward Clarification of a Fractured Paradigm”,. Journal of Communication, 43 (4): 6-27.
Frewer, Lynn. J., van der Lans, Ivo. A., Fischer, Arnout. R. H., Reinders, Machiel. J., Menozzi,Davia., Zhang, Xiaoyong., van den Berg, Isabella. and Zimmermann, Karin. L. (2013) “Public perceptions of agri-food applications of genetic modification – A systematic review and meta-analysis”, Trends in Food Science & Technology, 30 (2): 142-152.
Frewer, Lynn.J., Miles, Susan., Marsh, Roy. (2002) “The media and genetically modified foods: evidence in support of social amplification of risk”, Risk Analysis, 22(4): 701 – 711.
Gaskell, George., Bauer, Martin. W., Durant, John., & Allum, Nicholas. C. (1999) “Worlds apart? The reception of genetically modified foods in Europe and the U.S”, Science, 285(5426): 384-387.
Hagedorn, Charles; Allender-Hagedorn, Susan (1997) “Issues in agricultural and environmental biotechnology: identifying and comparing biotechnology issues from public opinion surveys, the popular press and technical/regulatory sources”, Public Understanding of Science, 6 (3): 233-245.
Heiman, Amir. & Zilberman, David. (2011) “The Effects of Framing on Consumers' Choice of GM Foods”. Journal of Agrobiotechnology, Management & Economics, 14 (3): 171-179.
Lassen, Jesper. (2018) "Listened to, but not heard! The failure to represent the public in genetically modified food policies”, Public Understanding of Science, 27 (8): 923-936.
Lore, Tezira. A., Imungi, Jasper. K., & Mubuu, Kamau. (2013) “A framing Analysis of Newspaper Coverage of Genetically Modified Crops in Kenya.”, Journal of Agricultural & Food Information,14 (2):132 – 150.
Marks, Leonie. A., Kalaitzandonakes, Nicholas., Wilkins, Lee. & Zakharova, Ludmila. (2007) “Mass media framing of biotechnology news”, Public Understanding of Science, 16 (2): 183-203.
Marks, Leonie., Kalaitzandonakes, Nicholas., Allison, Kevin. & Zakharova, Ludmila. (2003) “ Media Coverage of Agrobiotechnology:Did the Butterfly Have an Effect? “, Journal of Agribusiness, 21 (1): 1-20.
Matthes, Jorg. & Kohring, Matthias. (2008). “ The content analysis of media frames: Toward improving reliability and validity”, Journal of Communication,58 (2): 258-279.
Nisbet, Matthew. C., & Lewenstein, Bruce. V. (2002).  Biotechnology and the American Media: The Policy Process and the Elite Press, 1970 to 1999”, Science Communication, 23 (4): 359-391.
O’Connor, Cliodhna & Joffe, Helene (2020) “Intercoder Reliability in Qualitative Research: Debates and Practical Guidelines”, International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 19: 1-13.
Quiroz Villa, Annia. (2015). Didn’t we want to know? Comparative analysis of local vs. national framing of GMO labeling, University of ColoradoBoulder.
Rahimpour, Mehdi. (2004) Agricultural Biotechnology at Mazandaran University in Sari, Two-dimentional gel electrophoresis analysis of cells infected with rabies, 2004-2006. MSc thesis.
Rahimpour, Mehdi. Ebrahimi, Behnaz. Sardari, Sorush. (2008) “The view of Iranian people about GMO products consumption”, The 51 st Annual Biological Safety Conference. Annual American Biological Safety Association. October 19-22.
Rose, Hilary (2000). Risk, Trust and Skepticism in the Age of the New Genetics. B. Adam, U. Beck, & J. Loon in The Risk Society and Beyond-Critical Issues for Social Theory (63-78). London: Sage.
Ruane, John., & Sonnino, Andrea. (2011). Agricultural biotechnologies in developing countries and their possible contribution to food security. Journal of Biotechnology, 156(4), 356–363. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiotec.2011.06.013
Scott, Alan. (2000). Risk Society or Angst Society? Two views of risk, consciousness and community. B. Adam, B. Ulrich, & J. Loon in: The Risk Society and Beyond-Critical Issues for Social Theory (33-46). London: sage.
Vicsek, Lilla. (2014) “GM Crops in Hungary: Comparing Mass Media Framing and Public Understanding of Technoscientific Controversy”, Science as Culture, 23 (3): 344-368.
Vilella-Vila, Marta., & Costa-Font, Joan. (2008) “Press media reporting effects on risk perceptions and attitudes towards genetically modified (GM) food”, Journal of Socio-Economics, 37(5): 2095–2106.
Yang, Yang., & Hobbs, J (2018) “Information Framing Effects in Biotechnology Communication - A Comparison between Logical-scientific and Narretive Information”,. 30th International Conference of Agricultural Economists. Vancouver.
Zhao, Jennifer. H., & Ho, Peter (2005). “A developmental risk society? the politics of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in China.”, Internationa Journal of Environment and Sustainable Development, 4 (4):370-394.