نوع مقاله : مقاله علمی پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 دانشجوی دکتری سیاست‌گذاری فرهنگی، دانشگاه باقرالعلوم علیه‌السلام، قم، ایران.

2 دانشیار و عضو هیئت‌علمی، گروه سیاست‌گذاری فرهنگی، دانشگاه باقرالعلوم (علیه‌السلام)، قم، ایران.

3 استادیار و عضو هیئت‌علمی، گروه مطالعات فرهنگی و ارتباطات، دانشگاه باقرالعلوم (علیه‌السلام)، قم، ایران

چکیده

بلاک‌چین، به‌مثابه یک تکنولوژی برافکن و تحول‌گرا، دارای آثار و کارکردهای فراگیری در حوزه‌ی عمومی و فرهنگی است و نگاه غالب تهدیدمحور یا فرصت‌محور یا ترکیبی و واقع‌بینانه از آن، زمینه‌ساز اتخاذ رویکردها و خطّ‌مشی‌های عمومی و فرهنگی متناسب با آن خواهد بود. بازشناسی بلاک‌چین از کمند تحلیل استعاره‌های هستی‌شناختی، پنجره و دریچه‌ی جدیدی را برای شناخت دقیق‌تر این تکنولوژی را به‌دست خواهد داد. این استعاره‌ها مبتنی بر استعاره‌ی مبنایی و اصلی بلاک‌چین به‌مثابه شبکه یا سیستم، در سه سطح استعاره‌های فراسیستمی، درون‌سیستمی و بیناسیستمی دسته‌بندی و سپس تحلیلی از مهم‌ترین استعاره‌های بلاک‌چین، بدین نحو به‌دست آمده است: بلاک‌چین به‌مثابه رمزگان؛ بلاک‌چین به‌مثابه خزانه؛ بلاک‌چین به‌مثابه خداوندگار.

کلیدواژه‌ها

عنوان مقاله [English]

Redefining Blockchain Based on Ontological Metaphors

نویسندگان [English]

  • SAEED ASHIRI 1
  • Seyed Mohammad Hossein Hashemian 2
  • Ali Asghar Eslami Tanha 3

1 PhD Candidate, Department of Cultural Policy, Baqir al-Olum University, Qom, Iran

2 Associate Professor and Faculty Member, Department of Cultural Policy, Baqir al-Olum University, Qom, Iran

3 Associate Professor and Faculty Member, Department of Social Sciences, Baqir al-Olum University, Qom, Iran

چکیده [English]

The application of blockchain technology can have meaningful and significant effects on the "public domain", especially in the space of public governance, public culture and ethics, social issues, public health, public economy and transactions, public organizations and cyber security. Several studies have identified governance challenges for the application of blockchain in the public domain and have assessed some of its implications in the public governance space.
Now, technology in its ups and downs history has manifested "postmodernism" in an objective way this time. Blockchain, on the one hand, has made it possible for a wider number of thoughts, opinions, and narratives to emerge, and on the other hand, it has made it possible to exercise decentralized and plural power; Both of these functions have led to the weakening and sometimes the destruction of the foundations of the government's authority and as if it has sounded the death knell of modern centralism.
Blockchain in the space of cyber technology philosophy indicates the beginning of a new space in technological and social developments; Worlds based on decentralization, distributedness (based on distributed ledger technology), challenges the levels and levels of the previous social order - with an emphasis on decentralization or decentralization of central power and governance; It is on this basis that the regulatory institutions in the public space and governance of societies seek to determine their relationship with this transformative technology.
Regarding blockchain technology, especially in the view of the creators of blockchain-based technological products such as cryptocurrencies, several metaphors have been proposed, and their analysis will be important in the blockchain ontology project. Based on the credit theory, among these metaphors, the metaphors that played a role in the beginning of this technology will have more important meanings.
Blockchain technology, like any computer program in the cyber space, has emerged based on the logic of systems. In the following, we will further discuss the “Blockchain as System” metaphor, which we consider to be the “most comprehensive metaphor” about Blockchain and, beyond that, a kind of default for other metaphors. However, the author's assessment of the various metaphors related to blockchain, corresponding to the metaphor of blockchain as a system, can be divided into three levels:
Transsystemic metaphors. Metaphors that are generally about the existence of blockchain technology, such as blockchain metaphors as a system, network, discourse. Metaphors about the structural and internal space of blockchain technology, such as the metaphors of address, code, coin.
Bitcoin, Ethereum and other cryptocurrencies, and in a larger category of public and private blockchains, each is a product and system of blockchain technology, and each of these systems can be mentioned as a metaphor and example of blockchain; As in today's space, the most popular metaphor is "Blockchain as Bitcoin" and mainly in popular culture, people equate Blockchain with Bitcoin. In this type of metaphor, it is about how we get from a blockchain-based system (such as Bitcoin) to other blockchain-based systems (such as NFT) or to a blockchain-based meta-system.
Blockchain is an algorithmic system and network that is both orderly and order-creating, and can take people out of the conventional and everyday order that humans and citizens have achieved today in interaction with government institutions and in the conditions of political and political governance. Blockchain, based on that internal order and social order creation, is powerful and empowering; There is a projective power in his institution that can transform the foundations of existence, knowledge, man and society; This block chain can build both human and society (human blockchainization) and blockchainize existing human societies (digital society) and develop and expand blockchain societies.
Among blockchain metaphors, these three metaphors are more important than others: (1) Blockchain as cryptography. In blockchain, the nature of "message" is changed to "code" and on this basis, "meaning" is changed to "symbol". (2) Blockchain as a treasury. Blockchain, in addition to changing the nature of meaning, also changes the nature of power. Blockchain takes power from humans and turns it into cryptographic information in its treasury; stores power; It distributes power and ultimately supplies power. (3) Blockchain as God. Blockchain can be "everything" and contain anything; And at the same time not depend on anyone. Such a meaning will not lead to an understanding other than being "the Lord". Today's man is so intertwined in the digital society's taropods that, from the point of view of some, he will be able to achieve immortality by creating "immortality" in a digital artificial world. The design of categories such as "transhumanism" or transhumanism has become a basis for the realization of a post-humanist and post-humanist society.
In a way, this view can be seen in a kind of new theology based on technolism. A view that is based on the metaphor of "technology as God" and believes that the absolute power in the world and in the not-so-distant future belongs to that technology, and it is with technological advances that the control of technology over everything, even humans, will be realized.
Humans will gradually surrender their minds to the space of cloud computing and the logic of artificial intelligence algorithms, and life will be calculated, agreed upon and impossible to "make a mistake" (because it is impossible for a machine to make a mistake in its calculations); Based on this, imagine an orderly society without mistakes and problems, where everything is in its place and in the correct position; This is the "virtual paradise" provided by the digital God.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Blockchain
  • Cognitive metaphors
  • Ontological metaphors
  • Metaphor analysis
 
اشتریان، کیومرث. (1401). رمزنگاری بلاک‌چین و حکمرانی دولتی. تاریخ چاپ:27/06/1401؛ شماره‌ی خبر: ۳۹۰۰۴۷۵.
اشیری، سعید. (1397). گفتمان فرهنگ‌ساز. کرمان: انتشارات دانشگاه شهید باهنر.
بشیر، حسن. (1395). کاربرد تحلیل گفتمان در فهم منابع دینی، تهران: دفتر نشر فرهنگ اسلامی.
بهشتی، ملوک‌السادات. (1391). تبدیل اصطلاحنامه به هستی‌شناسی. کتاب ماه کلیات بهمن ماه 1391، سال شانزدهم، شماره دوم، صص‍ 26 تا 33.
حجتی، سید محمدعلی؛ مزگی‌نژاد، مرتضی. (1387). تصمیم‌پذیری سیستم‌های هوشمند. حکمت و فلسفه، بهار 1387، سال چهارم، شماره‌ی 1، صص‍ 29-50. Doi: https://doi.org/10.22054/wph.2008.5745
دلوز، ژیل. (1395). تجربه‌گرایی و سوبژکتیویته. ترجمه‌ی عادل مشایخی، نشر نی، چاپ سوم.
ردی، مایکل. (1390). استعاره‌ی «مجرا»: نمونه‌ای از مغایرت چهارچوب در زبان ما. ترجمه‌ی فرزان سجودی. در: استعاره مبنای تفکر و ابزار زیبایی. به کوشش فرهاد ساسانی. تهران: انتشارات سوره‌ی مهر. چاپ دوم.
شواب، کلاوس. (1396). انقلاب صنعتی چهارم. ترجمه‌ی سیدمجید میرحسینی و حمیده سلطانی گردفرامرزی. یزد: دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی واحد یزد.
فوکو، میشل. (1390). مراقبت و تنبیه. ترجمه‌ی افشین جهاندیده و نیکو سرخوش. تهران: نشر نی.
قائمی‌نیا، علیرضا. (1396). استعاره‌های مفهومی و فضاهای قرآن. تهران، سازمان انتشارات پژوهشگاه فرهنگ و اندیشه‌ی اسلامی، چاپ اول.
لیکاف، جورج و مارک جانسون. (1394). استعاره‌هایی که با آن‌ها زندگی ‌می‌کنیم. ترجمه‌ی هاجر آقاابراهیمی. تهران: علم. چاپ اول.
لیکاف، جورج. (1385). محافظه‌کار‌ لیبرال را سرزنش می‌کند! (استعاره‌ی اخلاق و قدرت در محافظه‌کاری و لیبرالیسم). ترجمه‌ی محمد محقق نیشابوری. خردنامه‌ی همشهری. آذر 1385. شماره‌ی 9. صص‍ 44-47.
مردانی شهربابک، محمد. پورنقی، سید مرتضی. اژدری، علی. (1399). بلاک‌چین و اعتماد دیجیتال (فرصت‌ها و چالش‌ها). تهران: دانشگاه جامع امام حسین (ع).
مؤمنی، فرشاد؛ نجفی، سید محمدباقر. (1401). اقتصاد دانش‌‌بنیان (مبانی، مفاهیم، روش‌شناسی). تهران: انتشارات سمت.
نفیسی، نهال. (1390). مردم‌نگاری و نیم‌قرن تغییر و تحول در فرهنگ حرفه‌ای انسان‌شناسی، پژوهش‌های انسان‌شناسی ایران، بهار و تابستان 1390، سال اول، شماره‌ی 1، صص‍ 61 – 78. Doi: https://dorl.net/dor/20.1001.1.22518193.1390.1.1.3.4
یورگنسن، ماریان و لوئیز فیلیپس. (1389). نظریه و روش در تحلیل گفتمان. ترجمه‌ی هادی جلیلی. تهران: نشر نی.
 
References
Atzori, M. (2017). Blockchain technology and decentralized governance: Is the state still necessary? Journal of Governance and Regulation, 6(1), 45–62. Retrieved from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2021.101625
Britannica, The Editors of Encyclopaedia. (2022). "Thor". Encyclopedia Britannica, Invalid Date. https://www.britannica.com/topic/Thor-Germanic-deity. Accessed 2 November 2022.
Buterin, V. (2014). So Where Did the Name Ethereum Come From? Ethereum Community Forum. 2014. https://forum.ethereum.org/discussion/655/so-where-did-the-name-ethereum-come-from
Christensen, C. M. (2013). The Innovator's Dilemma: When New Technologies Cause Great Firms to Fail. Harvard Business Review Press. http://library.lol/main/96D12C6F28003CD368D193AA277E7B78
De Filippi, P.; Mannan, M.; Reijers, W. (2020), Blockchain as a confidence machine: The problem of trust; challenges of governance, Technology in Society, 62. 2020. Retrieved from: 10.1016/j.techsoc.2020.101284
Dehaene, M., Cauter, L. de (Eds.). (2008). Heterotopia and the city: Public space in a post-civil society. Abingdon: Routledge.
Dimitropoulos, G. (2020). The Law of Blockchain. Washington LAW Review. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/339998624_THE_LAW_OF_BLOCKCHAIN
Elce, C. D. (2021). Tokenized Disaggregated Credit & Decentralized Institutional Monetary Design. (Working Paper). January 30th, 2021. https://www.rbnz.govt.nz/-/media/project/sites/rbnz/files/consultations/future-of-money/future-of-money---central-bank-digital-currency/13061181578_c-elce_redacted.pdf
Floridi, L. (Ed.). (2015). The Onlife Manifesto: Being Human in a Hyperconnected Era; Springer: New York, NY, USA. http://library.lol/main/05B3842D85EB03182CDBE79E6B14A2F8
Floridi, L. (2008) Philosophy of Computing and Information. 5 Questions. (editor) Automatic Press. http://library.lol/main/781BF43FC04CAB0AB3887D239EF24F06
Frizzo-Barkera, J.; Chow-Whitea, P.A.; Adamsa, P.R.; Mentankoa, J.; Hab, D.; Greenc, S. (2020). Blockchain as a disruptive technology for business: A systematic review. International Journal of Information Management. Volume 51, April 2020, 102029. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0268401219306024
Gianluca, M.; Kavanagh, D. (2015). “Bitcoin and the Blockchain: A Coup D’état through Digital Heterotopia?” SSRN Scholarly Paper ID 2624922. Rochester, NY: Social Science Research Network. Https://papers.ssrn.com/abstract=2624922
Gillespie, T. (2014). “The relevance of algorithms.” In Media Technologies: Essays on Communication, Materiality, and Society, edited by T. Gillespie, P. Boczkowski, and K. Foot, 167-193. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/research/wp-content/uploads/2014/01/Gillespie_2014_The-Relevance-of-Algorithms.pdf
Guarino, N., Oberle, D., Staab, S. (2009). What Is an Ontology? In: Staab, S., Studer, R. (eds) Handbook on Ontologies. International Handbooks on Information Systems. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-92673-3_0
Heidegger, M. (1969). Discourse on Thinking. New York, Harper Perennial. http://library.lol/main/2F3EC52AEFA3431BC235BBF2BE833290
Herd, C. (2019). Why Blockchain is a Hammer Looking for a Nail and Where it Might Find it. Jul 8, 2019. https://medium.com/swlh/why-blockchain-is-a-hammer-looking-for-a-nail-and-where-it-might-find-it-bc15faf11e21
Johnson, P. (2016). Brief History of the Concept of Heterotopia. (revised) Heterotopia. Studies. http://www.heterotopiastudies.com
Kruijff, J.D.; Weigand, H. (2017). Understanding the Blockchain Using Enterprise Ontology. In: Dubois, E., Pohl, K. (eds) Advanced Information Systems Engineering. CAiSE, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-59536-8_3
Lumineau, F.; Wang, W.; Schilke, O. (2020). Blockchain Governance—A New Way of Organizing Collaborations? Organization Science 32(2): 500-521. Retrieved from: https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2020.1379
Meijer, D.; Ubacht, J. (2018). The governance of blockchain systems from an institutional perspective, a matter of trust or control? ACM International Conference Proceeding Series. https://doi.org/10.1145/3209281.3209321.
Nakamoto, S. (2008). Bitcoin whitepaper. https://bitcoin.org/bitcoin.pdf
Oyinloye, D.P.; Teh, J.S.; Jamil, N.; Alawida, M. (2021). Blockchain Consensus: An Overview of Alternative Protocols. Symmetry 2021, 13, 1363. https://doi.org/10.3390/sym13081363
Paul Dylan-Ennis, P. et al. (2022). The dynamic imaginaries of the Ethereum project. Economy and Society 0:0, pages 1-23. https://doi.org/10.1080/02691728.2022.2086086
Pedro Jacobetty, P.; Orton-Johnson, K. (2022). Blockchain Imaginaries and Their Metaphors: Organising Principles in Decentralised Digital Technologies. Social Epistemology. https://doi.org/10.1080/02691728.2022.2086086
Rajagopalan, S. (2018). Blockchain and Buchanan: Code as Constitution. In: Wagner, R. (eds) James M. Buchanan. Remaking Economics: Eminent Post-War Economists. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-03080-3_17
Robb, L.; Deane, F.; Powell, W. (2020). Panoptic Blockchain Ecosystems: An Exploratory Case Study of the Beef Supply Chain. 46 (2) Monash University Law Review 79. 2020. https://bridges.monash.edu/ndown loader/files/31915673
Sfetcu, N. (2019). Philosophy of Blockchain Technology - Ontologies, Multimedia Publishing (ed.). https://www.telework.ro/en/e-books/philosophy-of-blockchain-technology- ontologies/
Sun, Y.; Jiang, S.; Jia, W.; Wang, Y. (2022). Blockchain as a cutting-edge technology impacting business: A systematic literature review perspective. Telecommunications Policy. Volume 46, Issue 10, November 2022, 102443. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0308596122001458
Szabo, N. (1999). The God Protocols. The Institute of Internal Auditors. November 15, 1999. https://archive.md/p9cMk
Tan, E.; Mahula, S.; Crompvoets, J. (2022). Blockchain governance in the public sector: A conceptual framework for public management, Government Information Quarterly. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0740624X21000617
Tanenbaum, A. S.; Steen, M. (2002). Distributed systems: principles and paradigms. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Prentice Hall. https://vowi.fsinf.at/images/b/bc/TU_Wien-Verteilte_Systeme_VO_%28G%C3%B6schka%29_-_Tannenbaum-distributed_systems_principles_and_paradigms_2nd_edition.pdf
Tipler, F.J. (1997). The Physics of Immortality: Modern Cosmology, God and the Resurrection of the Dead. Anchor, 1997. http://library.lol/main/2899CDE7F18B46BDC7AF58FD2BF080BE
Windley, P. J. (2021). An Identity Metasystem for Self-Sovereign Identity. Front. Blockchain 4:626726. https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fbloc.2021.626726/full
Parenthetical citations: (Windley, 2021)
Woodall, A.; Ringel, S. (2022). Blockchain archival discourse: Trust and the imaginaries of digital preservation. New Media & Society, 22(12), 2200–2217. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444819888756
Wright, A.; De Filippi, P. (2015). Decentralized Blockchain Technology and the Rise of Lex Cryptographia. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn. 2580664.